Re: [PATCH 6/8] i3c: master: Defer new-device registration out of DAA caller context
Frank Li <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.linux-i3c,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <agTK5tMCHdLEezCR@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> |
On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 08:45:55AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 12/05/2026 19:39, Frank Li wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 03:17:30PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > >> Master drivers may invoke i3c_master_do_daa_ext() during resume to > >> re-run Dynamic Address Assignment. As well as assigning addresses to > >> any newly arrived devices, this restores the dynamic address of devices > >> that lost it across system suspend, so it has to run as part of the > >> controller's resume path. > >> > >> A side effect of i3c_master_do_daa_ext() today is that it also > >> registers any newly discovered I3C devices with the driver model > >> inline, via i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs(). Doing that from the > >> resume path is problematic: a hot-join-capable device may join the bus > >> during this same DAA, and registering it immediately would push driver > >> model work (probing, sysfs, etc.) into the controller's resume context, > >> where the rest of the system is not yet fully resumed and the > >> controller driver is still partway through its own resume sequence. > >> > >> Decouple discovery from registration: add a reg_work work item to > >> struct i3c_master_controller and have i3c_master_do_daa_ext() queue it > >> on master->wq (the freezable workqueue) instead of calling > >> i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs() directly. The worker performs the > >> registration only when the controller is not shutting_down, and is > >> cancelled alongside hj_work in i3c_master_shutdown(). Because wq is > >> freezable, any newly observed devices end up being registered after > >> the system has finished resuming. > >> > >> i3c_master_register() also routes its initial post-bus-init registration > >> through reg_work, using flush_work() to keep probe-time behavior > >> synchronous. This keeps a single registration code path and ensures the > >> worker is the only writer of desc->dev. > > > > why not direct use hj_work? > > i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs() use of desc->dev is racy, so > i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs() must not be allowed to race > with itself. Having it only ever run via reg_work achieves that. Sorry, I have not understand these, Can provide some detail? Frank > -- linux-i3c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c