Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: i3c: dw: Add apb reset
Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.linux-i3c,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ahre-7YdlcOZkwS1@xhacker> |
On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 09:53:16AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 27/05/2026 06:18, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 05:25:45PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 25/05/2026 16:00, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > >>> Add dt-binding for support of apb reset which is to reset the APB > >>> interface. > >> > >> And this is ABI break, so you must explain WHY breaking ABI is worth > > > > This just adds an optional apb reset, it doesn't break any exisiting > > ABI. Kindly let me know whether adding new optional binding is also > > an ABI break. > > It does. One reset was before. Now all devices must have two resets. > Clear ABI impact. I checked the dts with only one reset by manual dt_binding_check and dtbs_check, it still work, so I'm not sure why those dts "must have two resets". Kindly let me know what's wrong. > > > > >> doing that or what is the impact. Additionally you should explain which > >> devices have it. Does Altera have it? You really lack explanation WHY > >> you are doing it and which hardware you exactly describe. > > > > I'm preparing one of synaptics SoCs support to uptream, it needs this > > apb reset signal for i3c. So you mean I delay this series until the SoC > > upstream series come, right? > > No. You just sent patch which basically says that Altera has two resets, > without any explanation of that. I guess you mixed other series/patches with mine here, no? I didn't mention Altera at all ;) What my series mentioned is adding apb reset which is to reset the APB interface. > > Write explicit patches with answers WHY you re doing and WHY its impact > is correct. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof -- linux-i3c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c