Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: i3c: xlnx: Add IBI and hot-join capability properties

Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.linux-i3c,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <20260814-cubical-transpire-413101a0c4c2@spud>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 05:21:53PM +0530, Shubham Patil wrote:
> In-Band Interrupt and Hot-Join are synthesis-time options of the AXI I3C
> IP. Describe them with two boolean properties.
> 
> A Hot-Join request is acknowledged by the IBI machinery, so a hot-join
> capable design is always IBI capable as well. Both events are reported
> through the controller interrupt, which is therefore required whenever
> the capability is present.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shubham Patil <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../bindings/i3c/xlnx,axi-i3c-1.0.yaml        | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/xlnx,axi-i3c-1.0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/xlnx,axi-i3c-1.0.yaml
> index 2caa245a8656..07e3d0b4d767 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/xlnx,axi-i3c-1.0.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/xlnx,axi-i3c-1.0.yaml
> @@ -32,13 +32,34 @@ properties:
>    interrupts:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  xlnx,ibi-capable:
> +    type: boolean
> +    description:
> +      The IP is synthesized with In-Band Interrupt support. IBIs are reported
> +      through the controller interrupt.
> +
> +  xlnx,hj-capable:

tbh, I'd prefer if these were spelt out a little bit more, characters
are cheap. Not a big deal though.

> +    type: boolean
> +    description:
> +      The IP is synthesized with Hot-Join support. A Hot-Join request is
> +      acknowledged by the same machinery as an In-Band Interrupt.
> +
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
>    - clocks
>  
> +dependencies:
> +  xlnx,hj-capable: ["xlnx,ibi-capable"]
> +
>  allOf:
>    - $ref: i3c.yaml#
> +  - if:
> +      required:
> +        - xlnx,ibi-capable
> +    then:
> +      required:
> +        - interrupts

Why is one dependency expressed this way, and the other expressed using
the dependencies property? Can the interrupts property be handled that
way too?

Cheers,
Conor.

>  
>  unevaluatedProperties: false
>  
> @@ -54,5 +75,7 @@ examples:
>          interrupts = <GIC_SPI 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>          #address-cells = <3>;
>          #size-cells = <0>;
> +        xlnx,ibi-capable;
> +        xlnx,hj-capable;
>      };
>  ...
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>

-- 
linux-i3c mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCan82egAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0iQrAQCs8qebR4quXdJpbjsXqfeQ608+ln1zNqvEfX7zedYCOAD/cYD8S+Ph/N6i
2fWFRkepRMirbphPDInTh0ZEKaL38Aw=
=GetW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.