Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: pwrap: Add compatible for MT6589 SoC

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.linux-mediatek,dev.linux.lists.mfd,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 7/16/26 19:17, Akari Tsuyukusa wrote:
> Add compatible string for MediaTek MT6589 PWRAP.
> Also update the description since MT6589 has pwrap bridge.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akari Tsuyukusa <[email protected]>
> ---
>   .../devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,pwrap.yaml     | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,pwrap.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,pwrap.yaml
> index e7c4a3984c60..a487ed39e6cb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,pwrap.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,pwrap.yaml
> @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ description:
>   
>     IP Pairing
>   
> -  On MT8135 the pins of some SoC internal peripherals can be on the PMIC.
> -  The signals of these pins are routed over the SPI bus using the pwrap
> +  On MT6589 and MT8135, the pins of some SoC internal peripherals can be on the

Soon, this will become

"On MT6589, MT8135, MT1234, MT3456, MT...." :-)

So, perhaps, it's a better idea if we say:

"In some SoCs, some of the internal peripherals may be accessible only
through the PMIC.
The signals of these pins are routed (blahblah)"

Cheers,
Angelo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.