Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Add MediaTek MT6858 power domain controller
Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.linux-mediatek,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 20/07/2026 21:09, Nikolai Burov wrote: > On 7/20/26 8:05 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 04:54:05PM +0300, Nikolai Burov wrote: >>> Add a new compatible and document bindings for the power domain >>> controller of the MT6858 SoC. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]> >> >> To provide review, please open and read the entire file. >> >>> Signed-off-by: Nikolai Burov <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> .../bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml | 21 +++++++++++++++++++- >>> include/dt-bindings/power/mediatek,mt6858-power.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml >>> index 070c6e5666dc..d03e4a925163 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml >>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ properties: >>> enum: >>> - mediatek,mt6735-power-controller >>> - mediatek,mt6795-power-controller >>> + - mediatek,mt6858-power-controller >>> - mediatek,mt6893-power-controller >>> - mediatek,mt8167-power-controller >>> - mediatek,mt8173-power-controller >>> @@ -56,7 +57,7 @@ properties: >>> faults while enabling or disabling a power domain. >>> For example, this may hold phandles to INFRACFG and SMI. >>> minItems: 1 >>> - maxItems: 3 >>> + maxItems: 6 >> >> And the rest? Why does this device have flexible number of access >> controllers? > > For mt6858, the "items" list I provided already overrides both minItems > and maxItems, so it has a fixed number (6) of access controllers. Correct, somehow I missed that part of the diff for this file. Best regards, Krzysztof