[PATCH v4 02/20] list: Permit context-unguarded access with list_empty_careful()

From: Marco Elver <[email protected]>

With Context Analysis (viz. Clang's Thread Safety Analysis), list_heads
that are __guarded_by(..) require holding the appropriate context lock
when accessing and manipulating them via the list API. Because Clang's
warning diagnostics do not perform inter-procedural analysis, this is
enforced by Clang with -Wthread-safety-pointer in the caller at the call
boundary; a warning is produced when passing a pointer to a guarded
variable without holding the appropriate context locks:

  warning: passing pointer to variable 'list' requires holding [...] [-Wthread-safety-pointer]
           if (list_empty(&ctrl->list))

An exception is list_empty_careful(), which is like list_empty(), except
that it is permitted to use without holding any context lock (carefully).

Mark list_empty_careful() __context_unsafe, which disables context
analysis within list_empty_careful(), but also suppresses warnings
generated in callers related to its pointer arguments.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/list.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
index f6f22c8b06f7..19212bfc3f6d 100644
--- a/include/linux/list.h
+++ b/include/linux/list.h
@@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ static inline void list_del_init_careful(struct list_head *entry)
  * if another CPU could re-list_add() it.
  */
 static inline int list_empty_careful(const struct list_head *head)
+	__context_unsafe(/* intentional lockless access to @head */)
 {
 	struct list_head *next = smp_load_acquire(&head->next);
 	return list_is_head(next, head) && (next == READ_ONCE(head->prev));
-- 
2.53.0