Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] nvme: fix cdev lifetime
John Garry <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme |
|---|---|
| Organization | Oracle Corporation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 16/07/2026 16:03, Nilay Shroff wrote: > On 7/13/26 4: 12 PM, John Garry wrote: > Fix the lifetime for the cdev by making > adding the cdev add take a > reference to the NS head and drop that reference in > the > nvme_ns_head. cdev_device release function. > > The same problem > > > On 7/13/26 4:12 PM, John Garry wrote: >> Fix the lifetime for the cdev by making adding the cdev add take a >> reference to the NS head and drop that reference in the >> nvme_ns_head.cdev_device release function. >> >> The same problem exists for the NS cdev lifetime, so resolve that issue >> through a similar method by taking a reference to the NS for the lifetime >> of the cdev. Note that nvme_ns_chr_open() -> nvme_ns_open() also takes a >> reference to the NS. Now that should not be needed, but that code is >> common to bdev ioctl, so keep as is. > > The bdev ioctl uses nvme_ns_open() and nvme_ns_release(). So, IMO, you may also > remove nvme_ns_chr_open() and nvme_ns_chr_release() methods. nvme_ns_chr_open() and nvme_ns_chr_release() call nvme_ns_open() and nvme_ns_relase(), respectively, and they do more than get and put a ref to the NS - specifically they also check that they are not called for multipath mode (as the NS bdev/cdev should be hidden) and take/put a reference to the controller ops module. Why are those addition actions not required for the cdev? Or should it be done when we add/del the cdev (like in this patch)? > > Otherwise this looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <[email protected]> > thanks