Re: [PATCH RFC v2 00/14] nvme: Controller Data Queue (CDQ) support
Joel Granados <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 14:38:18 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <77w6thdnghziwylsrzy2f37mltfsh54lyyumcafhanu6xt5jev@ffpbhy4yx2kk> |
--mvfg2fhode7n55sr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 11:48:43PM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > On 7/24/26 4:10 AM, Joel Granados wrote: > > NVMe LM SW WG > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > The NVMe Live Migration SoftWare Working Group (mentioned in [6]) was > > one of the main feedback points in my previous RFC. My main goal in this > > respect is to keep exploring different approaches in the hope that when > > it materializes we can "hit the ground running". >=20 >=20 > What does this mean ? -Chaitanya With this I meant that the pre-discussions that are possible before the Working Group materializes might serve as information that feeds the Working Group itself. Best --=20 Joel Granados --mvfg2fhode7n55sr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCgAdFiEErkcJVyXmMSXOyyeQupfNUreWQU8FAmpwi7EACgkQupfNUreW QU/2ygwAh7JDOaPvyjUJiglvHbnfvXOBzgbvvwSwni9jSanQQt76s8Wk2DqGgGD/ z9pJbhKR0qlyKJFemRW67oD/Hpa3gGu6udmUZpv+jRgNdj1x0BE611ir4vm2t+sT 9Bq+1EJ9ozDYwzzuHxnQOGPcP01jfWfxQLUh4atct9Hkxm2bhZg6yl8EhpGnSnmw 2vI7XgT9YvQkR4vIRKbgdSNtPa8AZRrivkPdboWC+l0cucdaFhEye8TG/OMkfVIj lwP5Mjg9un0z6Lj9lA1gEHXnNj1LStM6KxHWXPK4np/Q7PkzRrm5wkXu0HK9pmYA QhvezUTzKe7e3Od5pxnhFyxIdF2HlMK92s5yB+O8oI0wGVzonue5ansj/Yr0ZADY jiDQWC4CB/bxI7MRLPyvZO2ZhMiYUQljqlw25ROnnUWJz6+bGEvTo2KrwpB3AOHt GdvdifAjuhYkZ2o0JQpLvMfUhR8UpcW3eSLIkTLR96Rh6+aGTkE7+/HPvf+aRyXe 1PeORbUi =BX/p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mvfg2fhode7n55sr--