Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: ti,phy-usb3: document aspcie reference clock setting

David Oberhollenzer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.linux-phy,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On 8/5/26 9:39 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> Not a valid naming, missing vendor prefix and syscon looks like
> Linuxism, since you called it "system control module".
> 

I agree that this is a very vendor specific kluge and I suspected
it might need a vendor prefix. However, I ultimately tried to stick
to existing conventions.

There are 3 more syscon properties defined for this device:
  - syscon-phy-power
  - syscon-pllreset
  - syscon-pcs

None of them have a vendor prefix, all of them use the
description "system control module".

I take it, the existing properties already break best practices
that were established later? Or is there another reason they
lack a vendor prefix?

>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +    items:
>> +      items:
> 
> Missing -
> 
Likewise, I simply copied from the syscon blocks and made some
minor changes. Hence also the identical description. So this is
broken for the existing properties as well?

Thanks,

David


-- 
linux-phy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.