Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: ti,phy-usb3: document aspcie reference clock setting
David Oberhollenzer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.linux-phy,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On 8/5/26 9:39 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Not a valid naming, missing vendor prefix and syscon looks like > Linuxism, since you called it "system control module". > I agree that this is a very vendor specific kluge and I suspected it might need a vendor prefix. However, I ultimately tried to stick to existing conventions. There are 3 more syscon properties defined for this device: - syscon-phy-power - syscon-pllreset - syscon-pcs None of them have a vendor prefix, all of them use the description "system control module". I take it, the existing properties already break best practices that were established later? Or is there another reason they lack a vendor prefix? >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array >> + maxItems: 1 >> + items: >> + items: > > Missing - > Likewise, I simply copied from the syscon blocks and made some minor changes. Hence also the identical description. So this is broken for the existing properties as well? Thanks, David -- linux-phy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy