Re: [PATCH] phy: zynqmp: register PHY provider after probe initialization

"Pandey, Radhey Shyam" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.linux-phy,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/11/2026 4:49 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 07-08-26, 21:55, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
>> Register the OF PHY provider only after saved_regs allocation and
>> runtime PM setup complete successfully. Publishing the provider
>> mid-probe allowed concurrent consumers to obtain a phy via xpsgtr_xlate()
>> while probe could still fail, leaving them with references into driver
>> state that devres would free on the error path.
> 
> That fails for me!
> 
Thanks for the review. I assume you mean build failure? If yes, I will
rebase it on the latest linux-phy next branch and send out v2.

Also to add - this is a theoretical race identified through sashiko and
not something hit in practice. fw_devlink does enforce the ordering, but
since it can be disabled, it seemed better to make the driver itself
robust rather than depend on that.

>>
>> Reported-by: Sashiko <[email protected]>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
>> Fixes: b3db66f62446 ("phy: xilinx: add runtime PM support")
>> Fixes: 5af9b304bc60 ("phy: xilinx: phy-zynqmp: Fix SGMII linkup failure on resume")
>> Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   drivers/phy/xilinx/phy-zynqmp.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/xilinx/phy-zynqmp.c b/drivers/phy/xilinx/phy-zynqmp.c
>> index 240626b55475..8930cbe24b5a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/xilinx/phy-zynqmp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/xilinx/phy-zynqmp.c
>> @@ -1060,13 +1060,6 @@ static int xpsgtr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   					    xpsgtr_status_read);
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	/* Register the PHY provider. */
>> -	provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(&pdev->dev, xpsgtr_xlate);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(provider)) {
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "registering provider failed\n");
>> -		return PTR_ERR(provider);
>> -	}
>> -
>>   	gtr_dev->saved_regs = devm_kmalloc(gtr_dev->dev,
>>   					   sizeof(save_reg_address),
>>   					   GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -1082,6 +1075,14 @@ static int xpsgtr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   		return ret;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(&pdev->dev, xpsgtr_xlate);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(provider)) {
>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "registering provider failed\n");
>> +		pm_runtime_put(gtr_dev->dev);
>> +		pm_runtime_disable(gtr_dev->dev);
>> +		return PTR_ERR(provider);
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>>
>> base-commit: ea2bff00da89d7767d677bb68470130ba96f4928
> 
> and this does not exist for me!

oh i see , this was on linux-next, will fix it in v2.

Thanks,
Radhey

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.