Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: fix jh7110 SoC boot from SD-card.

On 7/29/26 04:21, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 7/29/26 11:39, E Shattow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/28/26 11:02, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> From: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2026 20:19:39 +0300, Ilya Sorochan wrote:
>>>> Add bootph-pre-ram to mmc1_pins clk-pins.
>>>>
>>>> U-Boot pruned their overrides recently in favor of Linux which broke
>>>> booting
>>>> from sd-card for me and Heinrich Schuchardt [1]. Pruning commit:
>>>> 27f617019dd070cb61f2 ("riscv: dts: starfive: prune redundant jh7110-
>>>> common overrides")
>>>>
>>>> [1]  https://lore.kernel.org/all/
>>>> [email protected]/
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Right, I am going to try this again. I don't think there's actually a
>>> valid technical argument against it, since it just affects the stage at
>>> which configuration is applied rather than configuration itself.
>>> If the configuration is wrong, and more devices don't use this
>>> configuration
>>> than do, people need to move the node to where they think should be.
>>> That
>>> shall be done separately.
>>>
>>> I don't want to hear about the politics about whether or not Starfive
>>> want
>>> to support it or reverse engineering of binaries etc. All that I care
>>> about
>>> is discussion of the hardware itself and which boards need this and
>>> which do
>>> not.
>>>
>>> Applied to riscv-dt-fixes, thanks!
>>>
>>> [1/1] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: fix jh7110 SoC boot from
>>> SD-card.
>>>        https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/42c57c049054
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Conor.
>>
>> Second NAK to this being applied, again, do not apply as-is.
>>
>> As you're not interested in the technical discussion, then you won't
>> have one.
>>
>> -E
> 
> As E does not offer any reason for their NAK, I guess it can be safely
> ignored as invalid.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Heinrich
> 
> 

Reason has not changed in 4+ months since the last attempt to shove this
patch through without technical merit. Please participate instead of
being like however this is toward me, I would greatly value your
analysis if you would just attempt to do so as Hal and myself have done.
It is unfortunate I find discrepancies in Hal's description that plainly
does not match what I find in the actual hardware. We should do some of
the work here not relying on Hal, and especially not relying on myself
(I'm not a career programmer obviously). Will you find time to
participate in review of the StarFive loader code and features that are
purported to be so desired for U-Boot compatibility?

https://web.archive.org/web/20260501210605/https://freeshell.de/e/riscv64/hrv-jhre-JH-7110%20BootROM%20analysis_2026_02_22.gar

-E

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv