Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/x86: add generic prctl shadow stack test
Bill Roberts <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Wed, 2026-08-12 at 13:03 -0500, Bill Roberts wrote: >>> +} >>> >>> >>> Nack'ing my own patch, Sashiko found a few useful things to fix. > Please trim the mails. That was a lot of quote to search through. > Sorry each of the many communities across my world want it differently... But, I would take a review while I re-spin patch v3. I am going to add get status and lock tests to cover those cases as well as fix the spelling mistake in patch 2's commit message, "consisteny". As well as fix the fork bug where -1 can be used in kill and send the signal to everything. Shashiko FTW _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv