Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] media: rockchip: VEPU510 H.264 encoder for RK3576

On Tue, 22 Jul 2026 20:29:53 +0200, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> This is really nice to see interest in enabling encoder for this chips
> set. I'm adding Detlev in CC here, as he's actively working on RK3588
> encoder, which is quite a similar chip.

Thanks, and thanks for looping Detlev in.

> So Detlev driver, which finally got P-Frames support few days ago
> (he'll explain why this didn't work initially for him) [...]

This is the most useful sentence in the thread for me. RK3576's VEPU510
and RK3588's VEPU580 are the same VEPU5xx family -- same vendor HAL flow,
identical reconstruction/reference-read (recn_refr) path -- and that
reference read is exactly where every P-frame stalls for me: the first
inter frame of a session hangs the encoder watchdog fetching the previous
frame's reconstruction, even though the reconstruction is valid and my
register writes match the vendor byte for byte. So whatever Detlev hit is
very likely the same bug.

Detlev -- whatever you can share about why P-frames didn't work at first
would help me enormously.

> While this isn't invalid [...] the community agreed direction was to
> introduce V4L2 Stateless Encoder specification [...]
> [...] we decided to look into making drivers similar to how we do GPU
> drivers today. This is possible today thanks to the Vulkan Video
> standard.

I'm not attached to the stateful interface -- I used it to get something
running on real silicon, not out of conviction. Before I commit to
reworking, I'd like to be sure I understand what "converge" means here,
because I see two fairly different directions in the thread: Paul's V4L2
stateless H.264 encoder (kernel-side reflist/rbsp/RC core), and the
Vulkan-Video split you describe for Detlev (thin kernel module + Mesa
userspace). Those differ a lot in kind and in effort. Which is the
intended target for the Rockchip encoders, or is that still open? Is
there a branch, early code or spec draft I should read beyond Paul's
series?

Either way the RK3576 hardware enablement and the reference-read fix are
shared with RK3588, so I'd much rather contribute the VEPU510 side to a
common base than maintain a parallel one -- I'd just like to know which
base that is before rebuilding on it.

Thanks,
Jiaxing

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip