Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] This series is split from the v15 "Add Type-C DP support for RK3399 EVB

Chaoyi Chen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.linux-rockchip,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-phy,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Sebastian,

On 7/28/2026 6:44 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hello Chaoyi,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 10:33:48AM +0800, Chaoyi Chen wrote:
>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>>>> - Scan the entire typec_bus and attempt to register the hpd bridge,
>>>>   so as not to miss devices that were already added during initialization.
>>>
>>> While that may help with the module being loaded late, it does not
>>> help with triggering the module load in the first place.
>>>
>>> The module does not have any MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() helping with
>>> that. So basically any system relying on the automatic hpd bridge
>>> registration and using a modular kernel (e.g. the arm64 defconfig or
>>> the kernels usually provided by Linux distributions) requires
>>> manually loading that module to get any graphical output.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you for pointing this out. I will add it in v5.
> 
> Add what exactly? As this code is quite generic, you don't have
> anything for a MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() (i.e. no OF, no I2C, ...).
> 

That is:

static const struct typec_device_id dp_typec_id[] = {
	{ USB_TYPEC_DP_SID },
	{ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(typec, dp_typec_id);

Just like the modules in drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/ .

> One solution I see to keep the notifier design would be to add
> 
> MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: aux-hpd-typec-dp-bridge")
> 
> to some other module and piggy-back on it. Alternatively integrate
> it directly to some other module, such as "drm_display_helper",
> which already has DRM_DISPLAY_DP_HELPER and DRM_DISPLAY_DP_TUNNEL.
> Adding TypeC DP AltMode as part of it seems sensible to me.
>

I agree, placing it on the DRM side looks more reasonable.

> FWIW I suggest you test booting your patches work with the arm64
> defconfig before your next submission ;)
>

Oh, I will. It's just that I've always been using buildroot. I'll check 
the situation with other distributions.


> Greetings,
> 
> -- Sebastian

-- 
Best, 
Chaoyi

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.