Re: [PATCH v10 07/69] drm/connector: Add HDMI 2.0 scrambler infrastructure

Cristian Ciocaltea <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.linux-rockchip,dev.linux.lists.linux-sunxi,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/19/26 1:12 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 07:19:14PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>> Add the connector-level infrastructure to support HDMI 2.0 scrambling:
>>
>> - A drm_connector_hdmi_scrambler_supported() helper to report whether
>>   the source supports the scrambling capability, based on the presence
>>   of the newly introduced .scrambler_{enable|disable}() callbacks in
>>   drm_connector_hdmi_funcs are mandatory
>> - A scrambler_needed flag to be managed by the hdmi state helpers based
>>   on the negotiated TMDS character rate and the source/sink scrambling
>>   capabilities
>> - A scrambler_enabled flag to track whether scrambling is currently
>>   active
>> - A delayed work item (scdc_work) to monitor sink-side scrambling status
>>   and retry the setup if the sink resets it
>> - A scdc_work_initialized flag to support lazy initialization of the
>>   work item on the first scrambling enable and guard the teardown paths
>>
>> These are intended to be used by SCDC scrambling helpers to coordinate
>> scrambling setup and teardown between the source driver and the DRM
>> core.
>>
>> Tested-by: Maud Spierings <[email protected]>
>> Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <[email protected]>  # NanoPC-T6 LTS, Rock 5B
>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 31 ++++++++++++---
>>  include/drm/drm_connector.h     | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
>> index 4721cdeafc84..a18410faf040 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
>> @@ -622,12 +622,29 @@ int drmm_connector_hdmi_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>>  	 * default with the actual controller capability. A value of zero keeps
>>  	 * the limit inferred from supported_hdmi_ver.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_2_0)
>> +	if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_2_0) {
>> +		if (!hdmi_funcs->scrambler_enable || !hdmi_funcs->scrambler_disable) {
>> +			drm_err(dev, "Scrambler callbacks missing for HDMI 2.x\n");
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +
>>  		connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = HDMI_2_0_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>> -	else if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_1_3)
>> -		connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = HDMI_1_3_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>> -	else if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_1_0)
>> -		connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = HDMI_1_0_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>> +	} else {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Scrambler callbacks are only valid for connectors advertising
>> +		 * HDMI 2.0 capability. drm_connector_hdmi_scrambler_supported()
>> +		 * relies on their presence to report scrambling support.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (hdmi_funcs->scrambler_enable || hdmi_funcs->scrambler_disable) {
>> +			drm_err(dev, "Scrambler callbacks unexpected for HDMI 1.x\n");
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_1_3)
>> +			connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = HDMI_1_3_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>> +		else if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_1_0)
>> +			connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = HDMI_1_0_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>> +	}
> 
> I'd put it into a separate test (possibly earlier). Merging both the
> tmds rate default and the scrambler callbacks check makes it messier
> than it would be if we had two separate tests.

Ack. How about the following?

	if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_2_0)
		connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = HDMI_2_0_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
	else if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_1_3)
		connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = HDMI_1_3_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
	else if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_1_0)
		connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = HDMI_1_0_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;

	if (hdmi_funcs->supported_tmds_char_rate) {
		if (hdmi_funcs->supported_tmds_char_rate > connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate) {
			drm_err(dev, "Enforced max_tmds_char_rate exceeds %llu spec limit\n",
				connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate);
			return -EINVAL;
		}

		connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = hdmi_funcs->supported_tmds_char_rate;
	}

	if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_2_0) {
		if (!hdmi_funcs->scrambler_enable || !hdmi_funcs->scrambler_disable) {
			drm_err(dev, "Scrambler callbacks missing for HDMI 2.x\n");
			return -EINVAL;
		}
	} else {
		/*
		 * Scrambler callbacks are only valid for connectors advertising
		 * HDMI 2.0 capability. drm_connector_hdmi_scrambler_supported()
		 * relies on their presence to report scrambling support.
		 */
		if (hdmi_funcs->scrambler_enable || hdmi_funcs->scrambler_disable) {
			drm_err(dev, "Scrambler callbacks unexpected for HDMI 1.x\n");
			return -EINVAL;
		}
	}

>>  	if (hdmi_funcs->supported_tmds_char_rate) {
>>  		if (hdmi_funcs->supported_tmds_char_rate > connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate) {
>> @@ -635,6 +652,7 @@ int drmm_connector_hdmi_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>>  				connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate);
>>  			return -EINVAL;
>>  		}
>> +
>>  		connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = hdmi_funcs->supported_tmds_char_rate;
>>  	}

[...]

>> +	/**
>> +	 * @scdc_work: Work item currently used to monitor sink-side scrambling
>> +	 * status and retry setup if the sink resets it.
>> +	 */
>> +	struct delayed_work scdc_work;
>> +
>> +	/**
>> +	 * @scdc_work_initialized: Tracks whether @scdc_work has been set up via
>> +	 * INIT_DELAYED_WORK(). The work item is initialized lazily on the first
>> +	 * scrambling enable, so this guards the teardown paths against touching
>> +	 * an uninitialized work item.
>> +	 */
>> +	bool scdc_work_initialized;
>> +
> 
> Why should we track whether it's initialized or not? I'd always
> initialize it, but only ever schedule something if we're using the
> scrambler.

Having this initialized in the connector would lead to a module dependency
cycle.

Currently the work function lives in drm_hdmi_helper.c, which is built into
drm_display_helper module:

static void drm_connector_hdmi_scdc_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
	[...]
	if (READ_ONCE(connector->hdmi.scrambler_enabled) &&
	    !drm_scdc_get_scrambling_status(connector))
		drm_connector_hdmi_try_scrambling_setup(connector);
	[...]
}

int drm_connector_hdmi_enable_scrambling(struct drm_connector *connector,
					 const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
{

	[...]
	if (!hdmi->scdc_work_initialized) {
		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hdmi->scdc_work,
				  drm_connector_hdmi_scdc_work);
		hdmi->scdc_work_initialized = true;
	}
	[...]
}

If we move INIT_DELAYED_WORK() into the connector (i.e. in drm.ko), the work
function has to be reachable from there.  The following attempts to accomplish
that would fail:

- Keep the work function in drm_hdmi_helper.c and export it from
  drm_display_helper.

- Move the work function into drm_connector.c and export 
  drm_connector_hdmi_try_scrambling_setup(), or a wrapper function, from 
  drm_display_helper.

Either way drm module ends up depending on drm_display_helper, which already 
depends on drm:

  depmod: ERROR: Cycle detected: drm_display_helper -> drm -> drm_display_helper

My previous approach provided the work function in the connector, and a callback 
set by the scrambling helper:

/* Part of drm module */

struct drm_connector_hdmi {
	[...]
	void (*scdc_cb)(struct drm_connector *connector);
	[...]
}

static void drm_connector_hdmi_scdc_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
	[...]
	if (hdmi->scdc_cb)
		hdmi->scdc_cb(connector);
	[...]
}

/* Part of drm_display_helper */

int drm_connector_hdmi_enable_scrambling()
{
	[...]
	hdmi->scdc_cb = drm_scdc_monitor_scrambler;
	[...]
}

Since it didn't get positive feedback, I ended up with lazy initialization
instead.  I think it's the better of the two, as it keeps all the implementation
logic inside the helper module rather than splitting it across drm and
drm_display_helper.

Thanks,
Cristian

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.