Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] simplified UML/NOMMU approach

On Thu, 2026-07-23 at 12:50 +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 11:35:41AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Prior RFC/v1 was here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-um/20260720185103.530603-11-johannes@sips=
olutions.net/
>=20
> Thanks for this! I really really want a nommu UML mode for testing purpos=
es so
> I'm very happy you're doing this :)

:)

> One mildly annoying note though - it'd be good for the cover letter to su=
mmarise
> what the series is about, what it achieves, how it compares for instance =
to
> Hajime's original approach ([0]).
>=20
> I guess how cover letters are used varies by subsystem somewhat but I fin=
d it
> really actively useful to see a summary in the cover letter.
>=20
> Anyway reading thorugh the RFC which already covers this seems that this
> achieves nommu UML with less changes needed which sounds really interesti=
ng!

Right, sorry, I got lazy and didn't copy/paste the RFC cover letter but
only put the link to it instead. Is there something beyond what I wrote
there that you were looking for?


> I may pull this series locally and have a play... :)

If you do, let us know how it goes :)

johannes