Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] um: change machine name for uname output
Hajime Tazaki <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:50:15 +0900
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.linux-um |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:35:45 +0900, Johannes Berg wrote: > > From: Hajime Tazaki <[email protected]> > > This commit tries to display MMU/!MMU mode from the output of uname(2) > so that users can distinguish which mode of UML is running right now. > > Signed-off-by: Hajime Tazaki <[email protected]> > [remove / to fix regression with systemd userspace] > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]> > --- > v2: regression fix I'd like to know what kind of regression did you see. > --- > arch/um/Makefile | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/um/Makefile b/arch/um/Makefile > index 937639edc295..1f85b73d4abb 100644 > --- a/arch/um/Makefile > +++ b/arch/um/Makefile > @@ -148,6 +148,12 @@ export CFLAGS_vmlinux := $(LINK-y) $(LINK_WRAPS) $(LD_FLAGS_CMDLINE) $(CC_FLAGS_ > CLEAN_FILES += linux x.i gmon.out > MRPROPER_FILES += $(HOST_DIR)/include/generated > > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_MMU),y) > +UTS_MACHINE := "um" > +else > +UTS_MACHINE := "um\(nommu\)" > +endif > + with only this diff, there is no visible changes with uname command on UML (both mmu/nommu), as setup_machinename() overwrite this. maybe we could drop this patch if we cannot put a name 'um' in the machine name ? -- Hajime