Re: [PATCH v3] lib: sbi: dbtr: do not unconditionally access tdata2/tdata3 CSRs
Himanshu Chauhan <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Jun 2026 09:38:06 +0530
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.opensbi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+Ht8=adDuL9VOqgXvxPXZNHd8pFxGxvHqg=iKDKXUMqqh3cUw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 10:31 PM David E. Garcia Porras <[email protected]> wrote: > > The current SBI DBTR extension implementation accesses tdata2 and tdata3 > without first checking whether either register is implemented on the > underlying hart. This produces an illegal instruction exception on > otherwise spec-compliant cores that legitimately omit one or both > registers. > > Per the RISC-V Debug Specification, Chapter 5 (Sdtrig ISA Extension) > and Section 5.7 (Trigger Module Registers): > > Section 5 (Sdtrig introduction): > "If Sdtrig is implemented, the Trigger Module must support at least > one trigger. Accessing trigger CSRs that are not used by any of the > implemented triggers must result in an illegal instruction > exception. M-Mode and Debug Mode accesses to trigger CSRs that are > used by any of the implemented triggers must succeed, regardless of > the current type of the currently selected trigger." > > Section 5.7 (Trigger Module Registers): > "Attempts to access an unimplemented Trigger Module Register raise > an illegal instruction exception." > > Per-register optionality is also explicit: > > Section 5.7.3 (Trigger Data 2, at 0x7a2): > "Trigger-specific data. It is optional if no implemented triggers > use it." > > Section 5.7.4 (Trigger Data 3, at 0x7a3): > "Trigger-specific data. It is optional if no implemented triggers > use it." > > Section 5.7.17 (Trigger Extra (RV32), at 0x7a3), which also applies > via textra64 on RV64: > "All functionality in this register is optional. Any number of > upper bits of mhvalue and svalue may be tied to 0. mhselect and > sselect may only support 0 (ignore)." > > Unconditionally accessing tdata2/tdata3 in the install/update/read/ > uninstall paths causes SBI calls to fail with an illegal instruction > exception on hardware that does not implement one or both CSRs, even > if the supervisor-supplied trigger configuration does not require the > missing CSR(s). > > This patch: > > 1. Introduces tdata_read_safe() / tdata_write_safe() helpers that > wrap csr_read_allowed / csr_write_allowed so that an illegal- > instruction trap raised by an unimplemented CSR is caught locally > rather than propagated. On the read path, a trapped read yields > zero; on the write path, the trap is silently absorbed (writes to > an unimplemented CSR are no-ops by definition). Every tdata2/tdata3 > read and write in the install/update/read/uninstall paths is > converted to these helpers. > > 2. On the install and update paths, rejects requests that program > a non-zero trig_tdata2 or trig_tdata3 into an unimplemented CSR > with SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED, matching the SBI spec > wording in sections 19.4 / 19.5: > > "One of the trigger configuration can't be programmed due to > unimplemented optional bits in tdata1, tdata2, or tdata3 > CSRs." > > Implementation status is probed once per call via the > tdata_implemented() helper. This only catches the "whole CSR > unimplemented" case; tied-off WARL bits inside an otherwise- > implemented CSR are not caught here and would require programming > the trigger and reading the value back for comparison, which can > be addressed separately. > > 3. Enable tdata3 configuration in the debug trigger install path. > > References: > - RISC-V Debug Specification, Chapter 5 (Sdtrig), sections 5, 5.7, > 5.7.3, 5.7.4, 5.7.17. > - RISC-V SBI Specification v3.0, Chapter 19 (Debug Triggers > Extension), sections 19.4, 19.5. > > Fixes: 97f234f15c96 ("lib: sbi: Introduce the SBI debug triggers extension support") > Suggested-by: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> > Suggested-by: Himanshu Chauhan <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: David E. Garcia Porras <[email protected]> > --- > Changes since v2: > - Wrapped the repeated csr_read_allowed / csr_write_allowed + > sbi_trap_info boilerplate in tdata_read_safe() / tdata_write_safe() > statement-expression macros, and the per-call implementation probe > in a tdata_implemented() macro returning a boolean, per Himanshu > Chauhan's review. All open-coded tdata2/tdata3 reads, writes and > probes now go through these helpers. > - The install / update SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED checks now call > tdata_implemented() and are collapsed into a single condition per > path. > > Changes since v1: > - Replaced the boot-time probe and the cached per-hart > tdata2_supported / tdata3_supported flags with per-access > csr_read_allowed / csr_write_allowed at every tdata2/tdata3 site, > per Nicholas Piggin's review. This covers both spec-compliant > cores and implementations whose trap behavior depends on the > currently selected trigger type (e.g. QEMU's tdata_available()). > - Dropped the additions to struct sbi_dbtr_hart_triggers_state. > - Install / update SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED checks now probe via > csr_read_allowed once per call. Added a comment noting that this > only catches the "whole CSR unimplemented" case; tied-off WARL > bits inside an implemented CSR are not detected and can be > addressed in a follow-up. > > lib/sbi/sbi_dbtr.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_dbtr.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_dbtr.c > index 8bcb4312..01047969 100644 > --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_dbtr.c > +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_dbtr.c > @@ -34,6 +34,25 @@ static unsigned long hart_state_ptr_offset; > sbi_scratch_write_type((__scratch), void *, hart_state_ptr_offset, \ > (__hart_state)) > > +#define tdata_read_safe(__csr) \ > + ({ \ > + struct sbi_trap_info __trap = {0}; \ > + csr_read_allowed((__csr), &__trap); \ > + }) > + > +#define tdata_write_safe(__csr, __value) \ > + ({ \ > + struct sbi_trap_info __trap = {0}; \ > + csr_write_allowed((__csr), &__trap, (__value)); \ > + }) > + > +#define tdata_implemented(__csr) \ > + ({ \ > + struct sbi_trap_info __trap = {0}; \ > + csr_read_allowed((__csr), &__trap); \ > + !__trap.cause; \ > + }) > + > #define INDEX_TO_TRIGGER(_index) \ > ({ \ > struct sbi_dbtr_trigger *__trg = NULL; \ > @@ -418,7 +437,8 @@ static void dbtr_trigger_enable(struct sbi_dbtr_trigger *trig) > */ > csr_write(CSR_TSELECT, trig->index); > csr_write(CSR_TDATA1, 0x0); > - csr_write(CSR_TDATA2, trig->tdata2); > + tdata_write_safe(CSR_TDATA2, trig->tdata2); > + tdata_write_safe(CSR_TDATA3, trig->tdata3); > csr_write(CSR_TDATA1, trig->tdata1); > } > > @@ -463,7 +483,8 @@ static void dbtr_trigger_clear(struct sbi_dbtr_trigger *trig) > > csr_write(CSR_TSELECT, trig->index); > csr_write(CSR_TDATA1, 0x0); > - csr_write(CSR_TDATA2, 0x0); > + tdata_write_safe(CSR_TDATA2, 0x0); > + tdata_write_safe(CSR_TDATA3, 0x0); > } > > static int dbtr_trigger_supported(unsigned long type) > @@ -566,8 +587,8 @@ int sbi_dbtr_read_trig(unsigned long smode, > trig = INDEX_TO_TRIGGER((_idx + trig_idx_base)); > csr_write(CSR_TSELECT, trig->index); > trig->tdata1 = csr_read(CSR_TDATA1); > - trig->tdata2 = csr_read(CSR_TDATA2); > - trig->tdata3 = csr_read(CSR_TDATA3); > + trig->tdata2 = tdata_read_safe(CSR_TDATA2); > + trig->tdata3 = tdata_read_safe(CSR_TDATA3); > xmit->tstate = cpu_to_lle(trig->state); > xmit->tdata1 = cpu_to_lle(trig->tdata1); > xmit->tdata2 = cpu_to_lle(trig->tdata2); > @@ -589,6 +610,7 @@ int sbi_dbtr_install_trig(unsigned long smode, > unsigned long ctrl; > struct sbi_dbtr_trigger *trig; > struct sbi_dbtr_hart_triggers_state *hs = NULL; > + bool tdata2_impl, tdata3_impl; > > hs = dbtr_thishart_state_ptr(); > if (!hs) > @@ -601,6 +623,15 @@ int sbi_dbtr_install_trig(unsigned long smode, > sbi_hart_protection_map_range((unsigned long)shmem_base, > trig_count * sizeof(*entry)); > > + /* > + * SBI v3.0 sec 19.4 requires SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED when a trigger > + * programs a non-zero value into an unimplemented optional CSR. Only > + * the "whole CSR unimplemented" case is caught; WARL bits tied off > + * inside an otherwise-implemented CSR are not. > + */ > + tdata2_impl = tdata_implemented(CSR_TDATA2); > + tdata3_impl = tdata_implemented(CSR_TDATA3); > + > /* Check requested triggers configuration */ > for_each_trig_entry(shmem_base, trig_count, typeof(*entry), entry) { > recv = (struct sbi_dbtr_data_msg *)(&entry->data); > @@ -619,6 +650,14 @@ int sbi_dbtr_install_trig(unsigned long smode, > trig_count * sizeof(*entry)); > return SBI_ERR_FAILED; > } > + > + if ((recv->tdata2 && !tdata2_impl) || > + (recv->tdata3 && !tdata3_impl)) { > + *out = _idx; > + sbi_hart_protection_unmap_range((unsigned long)shmem_base, > + trig_count * sizeof(*entry)); > + return SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED; > + } > } > > if (hs->available_trigs < trig_count) { > @@ -705,6 +744,7 @@ int sbi_dbtr_update_trig(unsigned long smode, > union sbi_dbtr_shmem_entry *entry; > void *shmem_base = NULL; > struct sbi_dbtr_hart_triggers_state *hs = NULL; > + bool tdata2_impl, tdata3_impl; > > hs = dbtr_thishart_state_ptr(); > if (!hs) > @@ -718,6 +758,15 @@ int sbi_dbtr_update_trig(unsigned long smode, > if (trig_count >= hs->total_trigs) > return SBI_ERR_BAD_RANGE; > > + /* > + * SBI v3.0 sec 19.5 requires SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED when a trigger > + * programs a non-zero value into an unimplemented optional CSR. Only > + * the "whole CSR unimplemented" case is caught; WARL bits tied off > + * inside an otherwise-implemented CSR are not. > + */ > + tdata2_impl = tdata_implemented(CSR_TDATA2); > + tdata3_impl = tdata_implemented(CSR_TDATA3); > + > for_each_trig_entry(shmem_base, trig_count, typeof(*entry), entry) { > sbi_hart_protection_map_range((unsigned long)entry, sizeof(*entry)); > trig_idx = entry->id.idx; > @@ -734,6 +783,12 @@ int sbi_dbtr_update_trig(unsigned long smode, > return SBI_ERR_FAILED; > } > > + if ((entry->data.tdata2 && !tdata2_impl) || > + (entry->data.tdata3 && !tdata3_impl)) { > + sbi_hart_protection_unmap_range((unsigned long)entry, sizeof(*entry)); > + return SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED; > + } > + > dbtr_trigger_setup(trig, &entry->data); > sbi_hart_protection_unmap_range((unsigned long)entry, sizeof(*entry)); > dbtr_trigger_enable(trig); Thanks David. Looks good to me. Reviewed-By: Himanshu Chauhan <[email protected]> > -- > 2.43.0 -- opensbi mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi