Re: wireless-regdb: Inaccurate regulatory rules for Brunei (BN)

Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]> Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:19:56 +0800
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.wireless-regdb,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless
Message-ID <CAGb2v64OsGpERdrojMgfbQspk_vwsm-X16Nj4ntvN+1azaEM9w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 12:51 PM Nathaniel Chin
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that the current values in the regdb for Brunei do not
> match with the Brunei Darussalam Radio Spectrum Plan (2014-2015 version)
> <https://www.aiti.gov.bn/media/voqau1jw/brunei-darussalam-radio-spectrum-plan-2014-2015.pdf>
> and the Telecommunications (Exemption from Sections 33,34(1)(b) and 35)
> Notification, 2018
> <https://www.agc.gov.bn/AGC%20Images/LAWS/Gazette_PDF/2018/S039.pdf>.
>
> Which both state that the authorised bands are: 2.4000 - 2.4835 GHz at a
> max of 200 mW; 5.150-5.350 GHz at a max of 1000 mW (2018 document); and
> 5.725 - 5.850 GHz at a max of 1000/4000 mW (with the latter requiring a
> license).

Thank you for reporting this. I currently cannot open the 2014-2015
document, nor the underlying website. It seems I am blocked.

Regardless, the values you report align with the 2018 document. One
oddity is that for 5.150-5.350 GHz, the 2018 document reports two
limits: 100 mW and 1000 mW. Do you know what that is about?

> Additionally the 2015 document refers to FCC and ETSI regulations and I
> don't see any mention of Japanese regulations?

This is from an old change that added DFS-JP and associated a bunch of
regions with it. There was no reference given.

Without access to the 2015 document I have no idea what the DFS requirements
are. They could also be under some technical specification that describes
the test methods for compliance.


Thanks
ChenYu

> Best regards,
> Nathaniel Chin
>
> P.S I've had to resend this email because initially it was sent as HTML
> instead of plain text so if you've received two copies: sorry.
>