Re: wireless-regdb: Inaccurate regulatory rules for Brunei (BN)

Hi,

> Thank you for reporting this. I currently cannot open the 2014-2015
> document, nor the underlying website. It seems I am blocked.
I also seem to be unable to access the entire aiti.gov.bn domain as a 
whole as well but this specific document hasbeen archived in archive.org 
<https://web.archive.org/web/20240724130146/https://www.aiti.gov.bn/media/voqau1jw/brunei-darussalam-radio-spectrum-plan-2014-2015.pdf>

> the 2018 document reports two
> limits: 100 mW and 1000 mW. Do you know what that is about?
Unfortunately, no

I've found another document 
<https://web.archive.org/web/20240724125731/https://www.aiti.gov.bn/media/qjchjoni/code-of-practice-for-srd.pdf> 
(appears to be un-dated) which makes specific mention of DFS and TPC.

Best regards,
Nathaniel

On 12/8/2024 4:19 pm, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 12:51 PM Nathaniel Chin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've noticed that the current values in the regdb for Brunei do not
>> match with the Brunei Darussalam Radio Spectrum Plan (2014-2015 version)
>> <https://www.aiti.gov.bn/media/voqau1jw/brunei-darussalam-radio-spectrum-plan-2014-2015.pdf>
>> and the Telecommunications (Exemption from Sections 33,34(1)(b) and 35)
>> Notification, 2018
>> <https://www.agc.gov.bn/AGC%20Images/LAWS/Gazette_PDF/2018/S039.pdf>.
>>
>> Which both state that the authorised bands are: 2.4000 - 2.4835 GHz at a
>> max of 200 mW; 5.150-5.350 GHz at a max of 1000 mW (2018 document); and
>> 5.725 - 5.850 GHz at a max of 1000/4000 mW (with the latter requiring a
>> license).
> Thank you for reporting this. I currently cannot open the 2014-2015
> document, nor the underlying website. It seems I am blocked.
>
> Regardless, the values you report align with the 2018 document. One
> oddity is that for 5.150-5.350 GHz, the 2018 document reports two
> limits: 100 mW and 1000 mW. Do you know what that is about?
>
>> Additionally the 2015 document refers to FCC and ETSI regulations and I
>> don't see any mention of Japanese regulations?
> This is from an old change that added DFS-JP and associated a bunch of
> regions with it. There was no reference given.
>
> Without access to the 2015 document I have no idea what the DFS requirements
> are. They could also be under some technical specification that describes
> the test methods for compliance.
>
>
> Thanks
> ChenYu
>
>> Best regards,
>> Nathaniel Chin
>>
>> P.S I've had to resend this email because initially it was sent as HTML
>> instead of plain text so if you've received two copies: sorry.
>>