Re: Please add key for Vineet Gupta (ARC maintainer)
Vineet Gupta <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Jun 2025 11:09:26 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.linux.keys |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Uwe, On 6/13/25 02:49, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > hello Vineet, > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 02:52:52PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: >> >> On 6/12/25 14:08, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: >>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 at 16:59, Vineet Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Before creating your next UID is suggest you read >>>>> https://dkg.fifthhorseman.net/blog/openpgp-user-id-comments-considered-harmful.html >>>> Thx for the pointer. It makes sense. >>>> Shall I remove them from existing key and send it over again (I see it hasn't >>>> been pushed yet to the repo) >>> Yes, if you want to do that, I will hold off on processing this request. >> Thx, here you go ! >> >> pub rsa4096 2013-02-16 [SC] [expires: 2029-12-08] >> 397A6E0AE47A85E76B74B08969D7F1DDE28AC25E >> uid [ultimate] Vineet Gupta <[email protected]> >> uid [ultimate] Vineet Gupta <[email protected]> >> uid [ultimate] Vineet Gupta <[email protected]> >> uid [ultimate] [jpeg image of size 24452] > That looks better now. The scripts used to maintain the kernel keyring > will accept that key update, however your new primary UID has no > 3rd-party signatures. And also note that the signatures on your older > UIDs are all done using SHA-1 so they will be discarded on reimport. In > sum there is no valid trust path from Linus to your key. > > It would be great if you could get a few fresh signatures on your > kernel.org UID. The guys who signed your other UIDs earlier might be > good candidates to sign that without the need to arrange a meeting in > real live. Sure thing. I was thinking of asking a couple of my current colleagues (Bjorn, Alex) to do that instead. As long as signers are in the web of trust it should be fine ? > Also your key is affected by SHA-1 self signatures on the older UIDs. > The respective output of `sq cert lint` is: > > Certificate 69D7F1DDE28AC25E contains a User ID (Vineet Gupta (alias) <[email protected]>) protected by SHA-1 > Certificate 69D7F1DDE28AC25E contains a User ID (Vineet Gupta (official) <[email protected]>) protected by SHA-1 > Certificate 69D7F1DDE28AC25E contains a User ID (Vineet Gupta (personal) <[email protected]>) protected by SHA-1 > > > See > https://www.kleine-koenig.org/~uwe/resign-sha1/?certid=69D7F1DDE28AC25E > for some details. Also > https://lore.kernel.org/keys/fxotnlhsyl2frp54xtguy7ryrucuwselanazixeax3motyyoo3@7vf7ip6gxyvx/ > might be good to understand. I tried to fix the sha-1 concern, but ran into some issues. First up I presume this is all pgp2 as I have that alias in my bashrc from an early/old users.kernel.org recommendation. Per your link [1] above I was able to refetch the keys of others, force sign them and --send-key However my refetched key brought back the locally deleted old UIDs: was it because I had not uploaded it to Ubuntu key server, and MIT server where I did, is no longer functional / used ? Anyhow do the older/deleted UIDs need to be sha-1 fixed and then re-deleted and --send-key to ubuntu key server? Or is there a different order of things to do - apologies for these noob questions. Thx, -Vineet