Re: b4 v0.15.0 released
Mark Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.linux.tools |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 07:50:29AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 10:19:19AM +0000, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > I hope you guys are planning on sending the sashiko reviews as > > replies to the patches... eventually, ofc. Would be useful. > There's a thread about this, but channelling the Sashiko team (it's a > separatae effort from Konstantin's b4 project, nb4 is just using > Sashiko), they want to get the false positive vs useful detections > rate to the point where the reviews won't be considered annoying, and > then it will probably be on a per-subsystem opt-in basis. There's > been talk of having an option about whether the reviews should go to > the maintainers and the patch submitter, or whether the subsystem list > should be cc'ed as well. But all of this is still TBD. Right now even where it's accurate the reports it's generating are pretty annoying TBH due to it flagging preexisting issues it happens to notice through the same channel as it's reporting problems with the patch itself. If they were reported separately it'd be useful but right now they just make these reviews not a useful indication if there's a problem with the patches.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmnD3MoACgkQJNaLcl1U h9D4mwf/WItcJSwq1ICj0qKRgK7+4q9fRw5onu6IfJpcvEHSe8eDwBNP6uSygcyp +W8ux78a/Wa8YrfAy06XtbV0Qey8MVdoYtG1lvy+ULrC7joTT0Topl1RWfEUTWi4 P3d9ML/k9iD1zGiX0yIaiYdy4TR8YooXTL71NY9JzFEN3YknjMAmwvpCyq9qCFL8 KhqAPm4FPTdBaxI8OYbzRziEfhEZPfE4SBURNLBDtohEzu8E5It+hoe2b3+PtQK1 naBx8GJ7ZcXKt+a+Np4sIP4ZcLkIWHfZFYENXkdSJ3S1jLAcEo4giq6YREsHcgEZ efUotckj/1Bv7gltncOQ43nfj7f77g== =HkhK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----