Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kernel API Specification Framework
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.linux.tools,org.kernel.vger.linux-api,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kbuild,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.workflows |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMuHMdU5Ga9WCzD8ji8kgOMmosS+uzf_8mp_OkhFdcAg2=3KAg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Sasha, On Sun, 15 Mar 2026 at 07:36, Sasha Levin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2026 at 11:18:22AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > >On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:09:10 -0400 Sasha Levin wrote: > >> This enables static analysis tools to verify userspace API usage at compile > >> time, test generation based on formal specifications, consistent error handling > >> validation, automated documentation generation, and formal verification of > >> kernel interfaces. > > > >Could you give some examples? We have machine readable descriptions for > >Netlink interfaces, we approached syzbot folks and they did not really > >seem to care for those. > > Once the API is in a machine-readable format, we can write formatters to > output whatever downstream tools need. The kapi tool in the series > already ships with plain text, JSON, and RST formatters, and adding new > output formats is straightforward. We don't need to convince the > syzkaller folks to consume our specs, we can just output them in a > format that syzkaller already understands. > > For example, I have a syzlang formatter that produces the following > from the sys_read spec in this series: > > # --- read --- > # Read data from a file descriptor > # > # @context process, sleepable > # > # @capability CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE: Bypass discretionary access control on read permission > # @capability CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH: Bypass read permission checks on regular files > # > # @error EPERM (-1): Returned by fanotify permission events... > # @error EINTR (-4): The call was interrupted by a signal before any data was read. > # @error EIO (-5): A low-level I/O error occurred. > # @error EBADF (-9): fd is not a valid file descriptor, or fd was not opened for reading. > # @error EAGAIN (-11): O_NONBLOCK set and read would block. > # @error EACCES (-13): LSM denied the read operation via security_file_permission(). > # @error EFAULT (-14): buf points outside the accessible address space. > # @error EISDIR (-21): fd refers to a directory. > # @error EINVAL (-22): fd not suitable for reading, O_DIRECT misaligned, count negative... > # @error ENODATA (-61): Data not available in cache... > # @error EOVERFLOW (-75): File position plus count would exceed LLONG_MAX. > # @error EOPNOTSUPP (-95): Read not supported for this file type... > # @error ENOBUFS (-105): Buffer too small for complete notification... The actual E-values are positive, so I guess you want e.g. -EPERM? Note that the actual errno values are architecture-specific. E.g. EOPNOTSUPP can be 45, 95, 122, or 223. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds