Re: b4 review -- biggest pain points?
Mark Brown <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Jun 2026 13:41:01 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.linux.tools |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 11:07:37PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > I finally have some cycles to get back to b4 development in a fuller > capacity, so I'd like to do the next iteration of b4 review and b4 bugs > features. I know some of you are using b4 review fairly regularly, while > others have tried once and decided it's not working for them. > What are the biggest pain points I should focus on? From my memory: > - I know Mark sent quite a few bug reports and from talking to him I know that > huge series are problematic performance-wise. FWIW probably the biggest single issue I have right now is that the state machine around serieses can't cope with things being partially applied. This is a problem with things like picking bugfixes off the start of serieses, or multi-subsystem serieses.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmoiw9wACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Bk+gf+J+yoN/csB+wXV9oZ5PPvFKKcrHVLZ04pswWW9hV7MTqhdaXvlarMp1Am 5Jg6PRvZIjHeVNTk+eDEk4xozXbdIaOKncNTpUiHwtNn4lTC0pCuFDiiu6/Wm3Bj XF7g2kJSAzATM+7DuWbpYyBAk7Zq5NcpcOv/U7n2LM8wyPucEcLlhIzpR3UmU8gR YeeAGRclfYZ7Snedj5eGbkz7ZkY67kA+F0MCA+pi9KaiaZEoauHDNzUAcV3Y+N5Z B0qVM6N70eqNBHK7QYgLBxYsLc8thoJbg8r1Ly6JNilxAkIgTeehCOjZTmC4Z9g4 t/WR70a93If18D3L7xuVojglwUTtWw== =2jhB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----