Re: b4 review -- biggest pain points?

Mark Brown <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Jun 2026 13:41:01 +0100
Newsgroups org.kernel.linux.tools
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 11:07:37PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:

> I finally have some cycles to get back to b4 development in a fuller
> capacity, so I'd like to do the next iteration of b4 review and b4 bugs
> features. I know some of you are using b4 review fairly regularly, while
> others have tried once and decided it's not working for them.

> What are the biggest pain points I should focus on? From my memory:

> - I know Mark sent quite a few bug reports and from talking to him I know that
>   huge series are problematic performance-wise.

FWIW probably the biggest single issue I have right now is that the
state machine around serieses can't cope with things being partially
applied.  This is a problem with things like picking bugfixes off the
start of serieses, or multi-subsystem serieses.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmoiw9wACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9Bk+gf+J+yoN/csB+wXV9oZ5PPvFKKcrHVLZ04pswWW9hV7MTqhdaXvlarMp1Am
5Jg6PRvZIjHeVNTk+eDEk4xozXbdIaOKncNTpUiHwtNn4lTC0pCuFDiiu6/Wm3Bj
XF7g2kJSAzATM+7DuWbpYyBAk7Zq5NcpcOv/U7n2LM8wyPucEcLlhIzpR3UmU8gR
YeeAGRclfYZ7Snedj5eGbkz7ZkY67kA+F0MCA+pi9KaiaZEoauHDNzUAcV3Y+N5Z
B0qVM6N70eqNBHK7QYgLBxYsLc8thoJbg8r1Ly6JNilxAkIgTeehCOjZTmC4Z9g4
t/WR70a93If18D3L7xuVojglwUTtWw==
=2jhB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----