Re: b4 review workflow issue with partially accepted serieses

Mark Brown <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:25:12 +0100
Newsgroups org.kernel.linux.tools
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 09:46:25AM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:

> OK, to help me properly model the workflow, is there ever a situation in which
> you would:

> - accept patches 1-3 from v1
> - request changes for patches 4-5
> - wait for v2 with those changes
> - apply patches 4-5 from v2

> In my mind, this was always a "send a follow-up series with just those 2
> patches" -- should we even support the workflow as described above?

Yes, that's a thing that happens - usually in that case the early
patches are bugfixes related to the work done to enable some new feature
that is the main thrust of the series.  You can ask people to split
things out and model it as two separate serieses but that's a bit of
faff for something that's broadly a tooling issue.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmopgdcACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9AGXAf+LeonR/qvctvEJ87itIWxTqYDsPwt425WtgX6+evIPzwMwbxPpvpwRjQD
8196nBrL8Hsrktg+p4MQ8kTyrC2z1DQC00856GCv8PyKSIk3UuE2BdCPJBQEaa6M
ZQcdFu2FjxcOKkQrIP/nEsNhHoyNgDpOzlm71gSVtnKEkBEqvI0QMXgBRPBNIneK
w4QtsS5A/TUtX2+73+BMlgvN2ygjTyiMeozno+Kea/HrTS88s8F8EKpMDh4HJhUq
PzJ0TR358OECDAvV8CCN/tI77DJJ9gE4f1BcFo3bs6mrL9eBKWHnhG73YBDV/fi8
saSNIJovPpeoemuJ1ytuZ0SPn3cDlQ==
=SJmF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----