Re: [Tyrel Datwyler] Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] ibmvfc: register and use asynchronous sub-queue
Konstantin Ryabitsev <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:51:39 -0400
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.linux.tools |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260615-smiling-kelpie-of-temperance-4dd61b@meerkat> |
On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 04:14:48PM -0500, Dave Marquardt wrote: > > Hi Konstantin. I'm using b4 to send patch series. I get these comments > about not having a Signed-off-by: tag. Should the tag be added by b4? Or > should the patch attestation be enough? That's not really the right way to put it. Different projects will have different DCO requirements and it's not up to b4 to enforce the presence of trailers. It's not the same as patch attestation -- the attestation's job is to mechanically attest that the patches haven't been tampered since they left your system. The Signed-off-by: trailer is more about the actual code you're committing. > I do notice that "b4 prep --check" flags some patches as missing the > Signed-off-by: tag, particularly when I've chosen to not fix some > warnings. It's speaking to you, then! :) You can either manually run all commits with -s (which is what I do), or you can set up a hook to do that for you automatically -- but since it's supposed to be a deliberate action by the committer, I recommend just always remembering to add that little "-s" after "git commit". -K