[MODERATED] Re: [PATCH v7 04/10] TAAv7 4

Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.lore.historical-speck
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 06:33:21PM -0700, speck for Pawan Gupta wrote:
> Is it okay to move x86_read_arch_cap_msr() further down just before its needed?

Yap, that's even better as it is common kernel code pattern: you
read/produce a value and then you do checks on it.

> +       ia32_cap = x86_read_arch_cap_msr();
> +

you don't need this newline.

> 	if ((ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_MDS_NO) &&
> 			!(ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_TSX_CTRL_MSR))
> 		taa_mitigation = TAA_MITIGATION_UCODE_NEEDED;

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg
--
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.