[MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 4/9] TAA 4

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:23:56AM -0700, speck for Pawan Gupta wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:15:43PM -0500, speck for Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 06:43:29PM +0200, speck for Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:32:40AM -0500, speck for Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > As I said before this would be a lot nicer if we could just add NO_TAA
> > > > to the cpu_vuln_whitelist.
> > > 
> > > We're waiting for a list of CPUs from Intel here, right?
> > 
> > I guess so, unless somebody else can deduce that from existing
> > information...
> 
> This is the list to the best of my knowledge.
> 
> +----------------------------+------------------+------------+
> |            Name            |  Family / model  |  Stepping  |
> +============================+==================+============+
> | Whiskey Lake (ULT refresh) |      06_8E       |    0xC     |
> +----------------------------+------------------+------------+
> |    2nd gen Cascade Lake    |      06_55       |    6, 7    |
> +----------------------------+------------------+------------+
> |       Coffee Lake R        |      06_9E       |    0xD     |
> +----------------------------+------------------+------------+

That may be helpful, but I think the question is how does that
information translate to the cpu_vuln_whitelist table.

-- 
Josh