[MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 4/9] TAA 4
Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.lore.historical-speck |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 24/10/2019 17:43, speck for Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:32:40AM -0500, speck for Josh Poimboeuf wrote: >> As I said before this would be a lot nicer if we could just add NO_TAA >> to the cpu_vuln_whitelist. > We're waiting for a list of CPUs from Intel here, right? > There is no model list required. Vulnerability to TAA is calculable directly from existing architectural sources. While the original expression might be ugly, and could probably be explained more clearly, it is correct AFAICT. I certainly have a very similar one in Xen. ~Andrew