[MODERATED] Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [PATCH 3/9] TAA 3
Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.lore.historical-speck |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed 30-10-19 20:27:58, speck for Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:24:03AM -0700, speck for Pawan Gupta wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 02:28:58PM +0100, speck for Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:01:53AM +0200, speck for Pawan Gupta wrote: > > > > From: Pawan Gupta <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: [PATCH 3/9] x86/cpu: Add a "tsx=" cmdline option with TSX disabled by > > > > default > > > > > > > > > > As late at this is, I really would like to change the name here. We > > > already have a powerpc command line option to disable this for those > > > chips, and we should use the same name here as well. > > > > I think powerpc calls it "ppc_tm=". We can't obviously change to this. > > > > ppc_tm= [PPC] > > Format: {"off"} > > Disable Hardware Transactional Memory > > No, but we can use "tm", and PPC said they would drop the "ppc_" prefix > and use the generic flag as well. "Transactional Memory" is the generic > term for this from what I can tell. Are those two (tsx and tm) going to have the same semantic? I have little doubts TBH considering how tsx itself is tricky. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs