[MODERATED] Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [PATCH 3/9] TAA 3

Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.lore.historical-speck
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed 30-10-19 20:27:58, speck for Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:24:03AM -0700, speck for Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 02:28:58PM +0100, speck for Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:01:53AM +0200, speck for Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > > > From: Pawan Gupta <[email protected]>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH 3/9] x86/cpu: Add a "tsx=" cmdline option with TSX disabled by
> > > >  default
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > As late at this is, I really would like to change the name here.  We
> > > already have a powerpc command line option to disable this for those
> > > chips, and we should use the same name here as well.
> > 
> > I think powerpc calls it "ppc_tm=". We can't obviously change to this.
> > 
> > 	ppc_tm=		[PPC]
> > 			Format: {"off"}
> > 			Disable Hardware Transactional Memory
> 
> No, but we can use "tm", and PPC said they would drop the "ppc_" prefix
> and use the generic flag as well.  "Transactional Memory" is the generic
> term for this from what I can tell.

Are those two (tsx and tm) going to have the same semantic? I have
little doubts TBH considering how tsx itself is tricky.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.