[MODERATED] Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] NX 3
Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Oct 2019 12:02:48 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.lore.historical-speck |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 29/10/19 21:33, speck for mark gross wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:39:58PM +0200, speck for Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 25/10/19 11:45, speck for Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:08:25AM +0200, speck for Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>>> index e7970a2e8eae..8979d5e7b6f5 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>>> @@ -969,17 +969,9 @@ static bool update_transition_efer(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, int efer_offset)
>>>> u64 guest_efer = vmx->vcpu.arch.efer;
>>>> u64 ignore_bits = 0;
>>>>
>>>> - if (!enable_ept) {
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * NX is needed to handle CR0.WP=1, CR4.SMEP=1. Testing
>>>> - * host CPUID is more efficient than testing guest CPUID
>>>> - * or CR4. Host SMEP is anyway a requirement for guest SMEP.
>>>> - */
>>>> - if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SMEP))
>>>> - guest_efer |= EFER_NX;
>>>> - else if (!(guest_efer & EFER_NX))
>>>> - ignore_bits |= EFER_NX;
>>>> - }
>>>> + /* Shadow paging assumes the NX bit to be available. */
>>>> + if (!enable_ept)
>>>> + guest_efer |= EFER_NX;
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * LMA and LME handled by hardware; SCE meaningless outside long mode.
>>>
>>> Works with ept on and off, thanks.
>>
>> Thanks, I'll include also the AMD version in a new patch and send it out as v8:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> index 4153ca8cddb7..29feb3ecc91c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> @@ -739,8 +739,12 @@ static int get_npt_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> static void svm_set_efer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 efer)
>> {
>> vcpu->arch.efer = efer;
>> - if (!npt_enabled && !(efer & EFER_LMA))
>> - efer &= ~EFER_LME;
>> + if (!npt_enabled) {
>> + /* Shadow paging assumes the NX bit to be available. */
>> + efer |= EFER_NXE;
> ^EFER_NX ?
Yes, see message id [email protected] on
[email protected]; I am about to send it to Linus.
Paolo
>
>> + if (!(efer & EFER_LMA))
>> + efer &= ~EFER_LME;
>> + }
>>
>> to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->save.efer = efer | EFER_SVME;
>> mark_dirty(to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb, VMCB_CR);
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>