[MODERATED] Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] NX 3

Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Oct 2019 12:02:48 +0100
Newsgroups org.kernel.lore.historical-speck
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 29/10/19 21:33, speck for mark gross wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:39:58PM +0200, speck for Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 25/10/19 11:45, speck for Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:08:25AM +0200, speck for Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>>> index e7970a2e8eae..8979d5e7b6f5 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>>> @@ -969,17 +969,9 @@ static bool update_transition_efer(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, int efer_offset)
>>>>  	u64 guest_efer = vmx->vcpu.arch.efer;
>>>>  	u64 ignore_bits = 0;
>>>>  
>>>> -	if (!enable_ept) {
>>>> -		/*
>>>> -		 * NX is needed to handle CR0.WP=1, CR4.SMEP=1.  Testing
>>>> -		 * host CPUID is more efficient than testing guest CPUID
>>>> -		 * or CR4.  Host SMEP is anyway a requirement for guest SMEP.
>>>> -		 */
>>>> -		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SMEP))
>>>> -			guest_efer |= EFER_NX;
>>>> -		else if (!(guest_efer & EFER_NX))
>>>> -			ignore_bits |= EFER_NX;
>>>> -	}
>>>> +	/* Shadow paging assumes the NX bit to be available.  */
>>>> +	if (!enable_ept)
>>>> +		guest_efer |= EFER_NX;
>>>>  
>>>>  	/*
>>>>  	 * LMA and LME handled by hardware; SCE meaningless outside long mode.
>>>
>>> Works with ept on and off, thanks.
>>
>> Thanks, I'll include also the AMD version in a new patch and send it out as v8:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> index 4153ca8cddb7..29feb3ecc91c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> @@ -739,8 +739,12 @@ static int get_npt_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  static void svm_set_efer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 efer)
>>  {
>>  	vcpu->arch.efer = efer;
>> -	if (!npt_enabled && !(efer & EFER_LMA))
>> -		efer &= ~EFER_LME;
>> +	if (!npt_enabled) {
>> +		/* Shadow paging assumes the NX bit to be available.  */
>> +		efer |= EFER_NXE;
>                          ^EFER_NX ?

Yes, see message id [email protected] on
[email protected]; I am about to send it to Linus.

Paolo

> 
>> +		if (!(efer & EFER_LMA))
>> +			efer &= ~EFER_LME;
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->save.efer = efer | EFER_SVME;
>>  	mark_dirty(to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb, VMCB_CR);
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>