[MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 3/9] TAA 3
Greg KH <[email protected]> Fri, 1 Nov 2019 15:33:45 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.lore.historical-speck |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 02:15:48PM +0100, speck for Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:35:26AM +0100, speck for Greg KH wrote: > > Anyway, yes, TM shoudl have the same semantic. But, if it's too late at > > the moment, we can always unify this later on if PPC really wants it. > > We can s/unify/add additional/ to minimize confusion. What I mean is, > we can add "tm=" as an additional option which coexists with the "tsx=" > option on x86 because the patches would have released already and we > would have communicated "tsx=" to people by then. So "tsx=" and "tm=" > would do the same thing on x86. Ah, yes, that sounds like a sane plan. thanks, greg k-h