[MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 2/2] more sampling fun 2
Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:20:10 -0600
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.lore.historical-speck |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20200226202010.k42cf4625ckk6ym6@treble> |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 03:59:06PM +0100, speck for Borislav Petkov wrote: > > I'd expect to call this one "SRBDS" a year from now. I find > > "srb_sampling" to be confusing and hard to remember because it renames > > something that already has an industry standard name. > > srb_sampling *is* srbds - just more readable. > > We are not giving any new names to the vulns - we're simply making our command > line options more readable so that when you have to type them, you either have > to remember "srbds" - in that order - or "srb sampling". > > Latter is easier for me. But you're leaving out the "data" portion of the acronym/name. Either call it "srbds" or "special_register_buffer_data_sampling" -- but *please* don't give it a new name. It will just create more confusion. If you can't remember what srbds stands for, that's why we have documentation and search engines. -- Josh