[MODERATED] Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] v2: more sampling fun 1
mark gross <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:43:29 -0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.lore.historical-speck |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:53:54AM +0100, speck for Thomas Gleixner wrote: > speck for mark gross <[email protected]> writes: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 07:16:33PM +0100, speck for Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> speck for Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> writes: > >> > What you should actually be doing is setting those bug flags in > >> > early_init_intel() where you can go wild with the steppings checking and > >> > then you won't need to touch x86_cpu_id at all. > >> > >> Either that or add a new cpu_vuln_shitlist beside the whitelist and > >> stick the new stuff into that. It kinda makes sense to keep all this > >> vulnerability nonsense in one place. > > > > I'm ok with either way. is there a consensus for making annother > > cpu_vuln_list? > > Go for the extra list at the same place so all that stuff is in one > place. I will do that. --mark