[MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 0/5] Slow Randomizing Boosts DoS v4.4.219 backport 0
mark gross <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Apr 2020 07:54:07 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.lore.historical-speck |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 09:47:11PM +0200, speck for Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> writes: > > speck for mark gross <[email protected]> writes: > >> From: mark gross <[email protected]> > >> Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Slow Ranomizing Boosts DoS linux-4.4.y backport > >> > >> This is a backport of the backports done by Thomas for linux-4.14.y to > >> linux-4.4.y. > >> > >> The backport needed a backport of one additional dependency for > >> cpu_data-x86_mask getting renamed to x86_stepping. > >> > >> This was tested by the test engineer who tested the other SRBDS implementations > >> and it seems to work. > >> > >> > >> Jia Zhang (1): > >> x86/cpu: Rename cpu_data.x86_mask to cpu_data.x86_stepping > > > > This one is missing and rightfully so. Maybe you get your mail setup for > > sending patches right some day in the future. > > > > This one has in the mail headers: > > > > In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> > > References: <[email protected]> > > From: Jia Zhang <[email protected]> > > Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 09:52:10 +0800 > > > > While it's correct that the patch is from Jia and was written on Jan. 1 > > 2018, neither the From: nor the Date: header in the mail are correct. > > > > That's commit b399151cb48db30ad1e0e93dd40d68c6d007b637 upstream. Do we > > really want to backport that thing to 4.4 or just live with the uglies > > of x86_cpuinfo::x86_mask ? > > Fished it out from the moderator mail, applied it to 4.4.y and then ran: > > # git grep 'x86_mask' > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c: if (c->x86_model <= 1 && c->x86_mask <= 1) yeah, I caught that in my backport that failed to send for some reason. There were a few places needing fixups. > I clearly can see how that was tested. I didn't test your backport of course. But, I did do a allyesconfig build that hit that and then I followed up with a similar git grep. FWIW : 1915 git checkout srbs-linux-4.4.y 1916 git cherry-pick 06be007aa436a Then I did a few fixups including the same git grep x86_mask and allyes and allmod builds. --mark