Re: [PATCH/RFC 10/14] dt-bindings: power: Document Renesas R-Car X5H Module Controller
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.arm-scmi,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.linux-renesas-soc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMuHMdVumfXkBtxzVBY27SRngHG2eOoWP+cgbkWQDNDkAW1mOg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Marek, On Thu, 7 May 2026 at 23:53, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/21/26 8:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > + '#power-domain-cells': > > + description: | > > + - The first power domain specifier cell must be either the Module > > + Power Domain Gating (MPDG) register index (0x00-0x3f) from the > > + datasheet, or a Power Domain number, as defined in > > + <dt-bindings/power/renesas,r8a78000-mdlc.h>, > > + - The second power domain specifier cell must be the module number > > + (0x00-0xff), composed of the Module System Reset (MSRES) register index > > + in the high nibble, and the Module Reset Destination bitfield index in > > + the low nibble. > > + const: 2 > > + > > + '#reset-cells': > > + description: > > + The single reset specifier cell must be the module number (0x00-0xff). > > + const: 1 > Just one more question -- the power-domain-cells second cell and > reset-cells are always going to be identical values, correct ? If so, it Yes they are. > would be nice to keep the description: aligned, and maybe even indicate > in the description that those two values have to be the same. I thought that was obvious (but apparently it is not)? The descriptions are identical, except for the latter not explaining again what a module number is composed of... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds