Re: [PATCH/RFC 10/14] dt-bindings: power: Document Renesas R-Car X5H Module Controller
Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.arm-scmi,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.linux-renesas-soc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/8/26 9:47 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hello Geert, > On Thu, 7 May 2026 at 23:53, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 4/21/26 8:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> + '#power-domain-cells': >>> + description: | >>> + - The first power domain specifier cell must be either the Module >>> + Power Domain Gating (MPDG) register index (0x00-0x3f) from the >>> + datasheet, or a Power Domain number, as defined in >>> + <dt-bindings/power/renesas,r8a78000-mdlc.h>, >>> + - The second power domain specifier cell must be the module number >>> + (0x00-0xff), composed of the Module System Reset (MSRES) register index >>> + in the high nibble, and the Module Reset Destination bitfield index in >>> + the low nibble. >>> + const: 2 >>> + >>> + '#reset-cells': >>> + description: >>> + The single reset specifier cell must be the module number (0x00-0xff). >>> + const: 1 >> Just one more question -- the power-domain-cells second cell and >> reset-cells are always going to be identical values, correct ? If so, it > > Yes they are. > >> would be nice to keep the description: aligned, and maybe even indicate >> in the description that those two values have to be the same. > > I thought that was obvious (but apparently it is not)? The descriptions > are identical, except for the latter not explaining again what a module > number is composed of... Please do spell it out in the document, this is a complicated topic and every little bit of extra clarity helps. Thank you ! -- Best regards, Marek Vasut