Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Rework SCMI transport drivers probing sequence

Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.arm-scmi,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <177987374695.279042.10837727890884135101.b4-ty@b4>
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:05:23 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> when the SCMI transports were split out into standalone drivers [1] the
> probe sequence was laid out in such a way that:
> 
>  - the transport drivers would have probed first, triggered by the firmware
>    driven discovery process (DT/ACPI)
> 
>  - afterwards the control would have been passed to the core SCMI stack
>    driver via the creation of a dedicated device that would have inherited
>    the original firmware descriptor (since that same DT/ACPI node would
>    have been still needed by the SCMI core driver to be parsed)
> 
> [...]

I haven't seen any reports of failure in -next with these, so I am happy
to take it for v7.2.

Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi/updates), thanks!

[1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add transport instance handles
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/9dfae7d2edb4
[2/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add a generic transport supplier
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/ab6eb28a47d4
[3/4] firmware: arm_scmi: virtio: Rework transport probe sequence
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/c08051901a55
[4/4] firmware: arm_scmi: optee: Rework transport probe sequence
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/524abd2fa690

--
Regards,
Sudeep
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.