Re: #thermal-sensor-cells under protocol@15
Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:34:51 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.arm-scmi,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/29/26 15:30, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 11:20:54AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 7/28/26 22:10, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> >>> The cells property is not for the SCMI sensor itself, it is for the >>> consumer of this node which currently is only thermal subsystem. >> >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 04:33:59PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>>> (3) Where exactly does the kernel consume "#thermal-sensor-cells" in >>>> the proposed (general) sense? >>>> >>> >>> No where, I got confused earlier as mentioned above. It is not needed >>> unless you have use case. Please present if you have one. >> >> Thanks for the clarification. >> >> IIUC, this means my original point stands: the #thermal-sensor-cells >> property is optional, and only needed if SCMI sensors (the "provider") >> are referenced by a consumer, such as "thermal-sensors". >> > > Agreed, but looking at that angle all #*-cells properties are optional > if there are no phandles referring back to the nodes. Right, I had only glanced at those superficially, but I figured as much. > Not sure if that > is represented somehow in DT schemas. I am currently unaware of that and > happy to know if that exists. > >> What about the following update then: >> >> | diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml >> | index d06cca9273c4..fde9d06342f6 100644 >> | --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml >> | +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml >> | @@ -223,23 +223,26 @@ properties: >> | protocol@15: >> | $ref: '#/$defs/protocol-node' >> | unevaluatedProperties: false >> | >> | properties: >> | reg: >> | const: 0x15 >> | >> | '#thermal-sensor-cells': >> | const: 1 >> | - >> | - required: >> | - - '#thermal-sensor-cells' >> | + description: >> | + If other nodes (such as a list property like "thermal-sensors") >> | + reference SCMI sensors from the "protocol@15" node, then the >> | + "#thermal-sensor-cells" property is required; otherwise, it is >> | + unneeded. "#thermal-sensor-cells" specifies the width of SCMI Sensor >> | + IDs for referrers, expressed as a number of 32-bit cells. >> | >> | protocol@16: >> | $ref: '#/$defs/protocol-node' >> | unevaluatedProperties: false >> | >> | properties: >> | reg: >> | const: 0x16 >> | >> | '#reset-cells': >> >> If you think this is unnecessary complication or verbosity, I can drop >> it; it's just that I'd like to construct a minimal "protocol@15" node >> for my use case (a particular DTS I'm extending), and be able to justify >> every little part of that addition. Presently I can't justify >> "#thermal-sensor-cells", so I'd like to leave it out -- but currently >> that would conflict with the documentation (even though it wouldn't >> cause a problem for any of the drivers included / activated). >> > > See above, it extends to all #*-cells properties IMO, again happy to get > corrected if I am missing something. ... OK, I'll leave it as it is, then. "Required but unused" is what I'll say when asked. Thanks for thinking this through with me! Laszlo