[RFC PATCH v3 11/59] ntfs: ->d_compare() must not block

Al Viro <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.audit,org.kernel.vger.io-uring,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
... so don't use __getname() there.  Switch it (and ntfs_d_hash(), while
we are at it) to kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT).  Yes, ntfs_d_hash()
almost certainly can do with smaller allocations, but let ntfs folks
deal with that - keep the allocation size as-is for now.

Stop abusing names_cachep in ntfs, period - various uses of that thing
in there have nothing to do with pathnames; just use k[mz]alloc() and
be done with that.  For now let's keep sizes as-in, but AFAICS none of
the users actually want PATH_MAX.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
---
 fs/ntfs3/inode.c | 6 +++---
 fs/ntfs3/namei.c | 8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/inode.c b/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
index 0a9ac5efeb67..d9782bdf8681 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
@@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ int ntfs_create_inode(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
 		fa |= FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY;
 
 	/* Allocate PATH_MAX bytes. */
-	new_de = kmem_cache_zalloc(names_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
+	new_de = kzalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!new_de) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out1;
@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ int ntfs_link_inode(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry)
 	struct NTFS_DE *de;
 
 	/* Allocate PATH_MAX bytes. */
-	de = kmem_cache_zalloc(names_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
+	de = kzalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!de)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -1761,7 +1761,7 @@ int ntfs_unlink_inode(struct inode *dir, const struct dentry *dentry)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* Allocate PATH_MAX bytes. */
-	de = kmem_cache_zalloc(names_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
+	de = kzalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!de)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/namei.c b/fs/ntfs3/namei.c
index 3b24ca02de61..cc1a701a4c72 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs3/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs3/namei.c
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static int ntfs_d_hash(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *name)
 	/*
 	 * Try slow way with current upcase table
 	 */
-	uni = kmem_cache_alloc(names_cachep, GFP_NOWAIT);
+	uni = kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT);
 	if (!uni)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static int ntfs_d_hash(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *name)
 	err = 0;
 
 out:
-	kmem_cache_free(names_cachep, uni);
+	kfree(uni);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int ntfs_d_compare(const struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int len1,
 	 * Try slow way with current upcase table
 	 */
 	sbi = dentry->d_sb->s_fs_info;
-	uni1 = __getname();
+	uni1 = kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT);
 	if (!uni1)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static int ntfs_d_compare(const struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int len1,
 	ret = !ntfs_cmp_names_cpu(uni1, uni2, sbi->upcase, false) ? 0 : 1;
 
 out:
-	__putname(uni1);
+	kfree(uni1);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.47.3
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.