Re: [PATCH v2] audit: Avoid excessive dput/dget in audit_context setup and reset paths
Waiman Long <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.audit,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/3/26 3:05 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 02:44:33PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/audit.h b/kernel/audit.h
>> index 7c401729e21b..03f3539b10e7 100644
>> --- a/kernel/audit.h
>> +++ b/kernel/audit.h
>> @@ -133,6 +133,13 @@ struct audit_context {
>> int name_count; /* total records in names_list */
>> struct list_head names_list; /* struct audit_names->list anchor */
>> char *filterkey; /* key for rule that triggered record */
>> + /*
>> + * pwd_reset is set if audit_free_names() has been called from
>> + * audit_reset_context() to reset pwd, but pwd is still holding dentry
>> + * and mount references to be used in later audit action without
>> + * the need to reacqure the references again.
> That's a delicate way to say "we have mounts stuck busy inexplicably for userland"...
>
> Generally a chdir(2) away from something immediately followed by umount(2)
> is _not_ expected to leave you with -EBUSY when nobody else has been doing
> anything with the mount in question.
That is actually a concern that I have at the back of my mind. I can
modify the patch to cache only the dentry and do get/put the mount every
time which is much cheaper as it is a percpu counter. In that way, a
chdir(2) followed by a umount(2) shouldn't cause a -EBUSY. Right?
Cheers,
Longman