Re: [PATCH 00/61] vfs: change inode->i_ino from unsigned long to u64
Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2026 16:49:26 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.autofs,dev.linux.lists.fsverity,dev.linux.lists.netfs,dev.linux.lists.ntfs3,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.ocfs2-devel,dev.linux.lists.v9fs,net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.amd-gfx,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.kernel.vger.ceph-devel,org.kernel.vger.ecryptfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-cifs,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-fscrypt,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-hams,org.kernel.vger.linux-integrity,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-media,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-nilfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module,org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-x25,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.selinux,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 10:55:02AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > The bulk of the changes are to format strings and tracepoints, since the > kernel itself doesn't care that much about the i_ino field. The first > patch changes some vfs function arguments, so check that one out > carefully. Why are the format strings all done as separate patches? Don't we get bisection hazards by splitting it apart this way?