Re: [PATCH 03/61] trace: update VFS-layer trace events for u64 i_ino
Jan Kara <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:11:06 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.autofs,dev.linux.lists.fsverity,dev.linux.lists.netfs,dev.linux.lists.ntfs3,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.ocfs2-devel,dev.linux.lists.v9fs,net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.amd-gfx,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.kernel.vger.ceph-devel,org.kernel.vger.ecryptfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-cifs,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-fscrypt,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-hams,org.kernel.vger.linux-integrity,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-media,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-nilfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module,org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-x25,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.selinux,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6exhq5gjvef5obfsqwkxfcpl2sjqmlv7klrzolodzpcjolgrmd@ds42ulhod7pw> |
On Thu 26-02-26 10:55:05, Jeff Layton wrote: > Update trace event definitions in VFS-layer trace headers to use u64 > instead of ino_t/unsigned long for inode number fields, and change > format strings from %lu/%lx to %llu/%llx to match. > > This is needed because i_ino is now u64. Changing trace event field > types changes the binary trace format, but the self-describing format > metadata handles this transparently for modern trace-cmd and perf. > > Files updated: > - cachefiles.h, filelock.h, filemap.h, fs_dax.h, fsverity.h, > hugetlbfs.h, netfs.h, readahead.h, timestamp.h, writeback.h > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]> ... > diff --git a/include/trace/events/writeback.h b/include/trace/events/writeback.h > index 4d3d8c8f3a1bc3e5ef10fc96e3c6dbbd0cf00c98..cc7651749eb3ce1123cb3ea9496f0803a0f4c1a0 100644 > --- a/include/trace/events/writeback.h > +++ b/include/trace/events/writeback.h > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_folio_template, > > TP_STRUCT__entry ( > __array(char, name, 32) > - __field(ino_t, ino) > + __field(u64, ino) > __field(pgoff_t, index) > ), > > @@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_folio_template, > __entry->index = folio->index; > ), > > - TP_printk("bdi %s: ino=%lu index=%lu", > + TP_printk("bdi %s: ino=%llu index=%lu", > __entry->name, > - (unsigned long)__entry->ino, > + (unsigned long long)__entry->ino, No need for explicit typing to ULL? > __entry->index > ) > ); > @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_dirty_inode_template, > > TP_STRUCT__entry ( > __array(char, name, 32) > - __field(ino_t, ino) > + __field(u64, ino) > __field(unsigned long, state) > __field(unsigned long, flags) > ), > @@ -123,9 +123,9 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_dirty_inode_template, > __entry->flags = flags; > ), > > - TP_printk("bdi %s: ino=%lu state=%s flags=%s", > + TP_printk("bdi %s: ino=%llu state=%s flags=%s", > __entry->name, > - (unsigned long)__entry->ino, > + (unsigned long long)__entry->ino, And here as well? And many times below as well... Honza -- Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR