Re: [PATCH 01/61] vfs: widen inode hash/lookup functions to u64
Jan Kara <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:14:45 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.autofs,dev.linux.lists.fsverity,dev.linux.lists.netfs,dev.linux.lists.ntfs3,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.ocfs2-devel,dev.linux.lists.v9fs,net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.amd-gfx,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.kernel.vger.ceph-devel,org.kernel.vger.ecryptfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-cifs,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-fscrypt,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-hams,org.kernel.vger.linux-integrity,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-media,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-nilfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module,org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-x25,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.selinux,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <hbvcdh2qnimdnbqnayykrcja6et2oyofe5h3s7n4imwbcaqht5@xq576inhcje4> |
On Thu 26-02-26 18:00:36, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 26-02-26 10:55:03, Jeff Layton wrote: > > Change the inode hash/lookup VFS API functions to accept u64 parameters > > instead of unsigned long for inode numbers and hash values. This is > > preparation for widening i_ino itself to u64, which will allow > > filesystems to store full 64-bit inode numbers on 32-bit architectures. > > > > Since unsigned long implicitly widens to u64 on all architectures, this > > change is backward-compatible with all existing callers. > > > > Functions updated: > > - hash(), find_inode_fast(), find_inode_by_ino_rcu(), test_inode_iunique() > > - __insert_inode_hash(), iget_locked(), iget5_locked(), iget5_locked_rcu() > > - ilookup(), ilookup5(), ilookup5_nowait() > > - find_inode_nowait(), find_inode_rcu() > > - inode_insert5(), insert_inode_locked4() > > - insert_inode_locked() (local variable) > > - dump_mapping() (local variable and format string) > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]> > > Looks good. Feel free to add: > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]> Thinking some more about this (and also seeing the discussion about patch 2) - maybe instead of using explicit u64 we should typedef kino_t as u64 and use that? Honza -- Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR