Re: [PATCH] backports: fix timekeeping ktime_get_raw_ts64 compile

On 2/2/21 2:29 PM, Daze Urey wrote:
>  From 7c615a7077e37ca5fc3ba5ad7ebe41441521fcd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: lunaticurey <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 21:23:53 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] backports: fix timekeeping ktime_get_raw_ts64 in
>   kernel under 3.19 we should use struct timespec instead of timespec64 
> . this
>   can fix compile in linux 3.18 t Signed-off-by: lunaticurey 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 
> Signed-off-by: lunaticurey <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

Hi,

It looks like this mail is white space damaged. I would suggest to use 
git send-email to send patches, this takes care that it is correctly send.

Please use your real name in the Signed-off-by line.

The change itself looks good to me.

Hauke


> ---
>   backport/backport-include/linux/timekeeping.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/backport/backport-include/linux/timekeeping.h 
> b/backport/backport-include/linux/timekeeping.h
> index 25ceaf3..fc2b75e 100644
> --- a/backport/backport-include/linux/timekeeping.h
> +++ b/backport/backport-include/linux/timekeeping.h
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static inline struct timespec64 
> timespec_to_timespec64(const struct timespec ts)
>   static inline void ktime_get_raw_ts64(struct timespec64 *ts)
>   {
>   #if LINUX_VERSION_IS_LESS(3,19,0)
> - struct timespec64 ts64;
> + struct timespec ts64;
> 
>    getrawmonotonic(&ts64);
>    *ts = timespec_to_timespec64(ts64);
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in