Re: backports spatch question
Ben Greear <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.backports |
|---|---|
| Organization | Candela Technologies |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/5/21 12:19 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 12:17 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: >> >> Did you test it? >> > > Yes, pretty sure we do it basically all the time. We don't have kernels > that new yet in most of our test setups. > >> Because that should be logically identical to what I tried if I read this file properly: > > Actually, your version might be more correct than ours ... > > I dunno. I note we also have an <linux/rfkill.h> include in cfg80211.h, > but that should be there upstream too, so not sure. There are a lot of rfkill.h files, what logic makes the backports code include the specific backport/backport-include/linux/rfkill.h file? I suspect that isn't working for the cfg80211.h file for whatever reason. Thanks, Ben > > johannes > -- Ben Greear <[email protected]> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in