Re: Dealing with SUBLEVEL overflow in backports
Jiaxun Yang <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Feb 2022 13:40:03 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.backports |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
在 2022/2/7 13:04, Johannes Berg 写道: > On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 12:52 +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote: >> 在 2022/2/7 11:11, Johannes Berg 写道: >>> Looking at commit b29eec6c49, does it even matter? We can continue using >>> bug.h which includes build_bug.h, it's just pulling in more than needed. >> Sorry, in which tree? >> > In 4.9.x. > > Basically, we _cannot_ include build_bug.h where we know for sure it > does *not* exist, since that would be a compile error. > > We don't _want_ to include bug.h from build_bug.h if we can avoid it, > since it's bigger and more stuff. > > But for 4.9.x, I'm not sure we need to change anything, since we'll > include bug.h from build_bug.h which should continue to work? Sorry I didn't follow, the problem for 4.9.297+ is when we are including bug.h, it just include build_bug.h from backport-include. Then in backport-include build_bug.h, the include_next is excluded so the real build_bug.h from kernel tree is never included and thus those macros supposed to be in build_bug.h can never work. Thanks. - Jiaxun > > johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in