Re: [PATCH v2] docs: add backporting and conflict resolution document

Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]> Tue, 03 Oct 2023 09:19:11 -0600
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.backports,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Vegard Nossum <[email protected]> writes:

> This is a new document based on my 2022 blog post:
>
>   https://blogs.oracle.com/linux/post/backporting-patches-using-git
>
> Although this is aimed at stable contributors and distro maintainers,
> it does also contain useful tips and tricks for anybody who needs to
> resolve merge conflicts.
>
> By adding this to the kernel as documentation we can more easily point
> to it e.g. from stable emails about failed backports, as well as allow
> the community to modify it over time if necessary.
>
> I've added this under process/ since it also has
> process/applying-patches.rst. Another interesting document is
> maintainer/rebasing-and-merging.rst which maybe should eventually refer
> to this one, but I'm leaving that as a future cleanup.
>
> Thanks to Harshit Mogalapalli for helping with the original blog post
> as well as this updated document and Bagas Sanjaya for providing
> thoughtful feedback.
>
> v2: fixed heading style, link style, placeholder style, other comments

So this seems generally good and useful.  I have a few small comments,
none of which necessarily block merging it in its current form:

- I would like to see an ack/reviewed-by tag by others with experience
  with this task if possible.  The lack of complaints is a good start,
  but not always indicative of a lack of disagreement...:)

- Might this be better placed in Documentation/maintainer?

- Colordiff looks cool, but I'd at least drop in a mention of the Emacs
  ediff mode, which offers (I believe) a lot of the same functionality.

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in