Re: Sunsetting backports.wiki.kernel.org

On Fri, 2024-10-11 at 10:15 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 02:01:41PM GMT, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > Please let me know how you would like to proceed. If I don't hear bac=
k from
> > > anyone in the next few days, I will configure the backports.docs.kern=
el.org
> > > with the current converted contents and redirect backports.wiki.kerne=
l.org
> > > there.
> >=20
> > Maybe for now it'd make sense to move the repo into the backports/ grou=
p
> > on kernel.org? Or are you trying keep everything together in
> > docs/docsko/?
>=20
> Yes, it has to stay under docs/docsko for the triggers to work properly.

OK, right.

> > It probably doesn't matter anyway, I'm just not sure how permissions
> > would work if it's in docs/docsko/, I guess you can still give the
> > backport group access? Who actually does have access to the repo now?
>=20
> I've granted access to that repository to the @backports group, so you sh=
ould
> now be able to push changes there.

Thanks.

> > Honestly, I have very little opinion on this - even the few changes tha=
t
> > backports is still seeing we're not taking much care of the wiki these
> > days. Maybe Hauke has any further thoughts.
>=20
> I'm perfectly happy to keep the source where it is. The only downside com=
pared
> to hosting it on readthedocs.io is that propagating changes takes much lo=
nger
> (10-15 minutes).

Let's just leave it then. Not that it was hard to do this all with
github for the wireless one, but I feel at this point, unless some
community re-forms here, it's mostly left as a historical artifact.

johannes