Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Fix netns reference imbalance in conntrack kfuncs

"Emil Tsalapatis" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu Jul 30, 2026 at 4:29 AM EDT, Chengfeng Ye wrote:
> The opts argument of the BPF conntrack kfuncs can point to a shared
> map value.  __bpf_nf_ct_lookup() and __bpf_nf_ct_alloc_entry() read
> opts->netns_id separately when acquiring and releasing the network
> namespace reference.
>
> The reference imbalance can occur as follows:
>
>   CPU 0                                  CPU 1
>   read opts->netns_id (-1)
>   skip get_net_ns_by_id()
>                                          write opts->netns_id (id)
>   read opts->netns_id (id)
>   put_net(net) /* no matching get */
>
> The reverse transition leaks the reference.  Repeating the unmatched put
> can destroy a live namespace and crash later users.
>
> The kernel reported:
>
>   Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
>   KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000000e8-0x00000000000000ef]
>   RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x52c/0x1700
>   Call Trace:
>    __sys_bpf+0x1662/0x50c0
>    __x64_sys_bpf+0x73/0xb0
>    do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x540
>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>   Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
>
> Snapshot every input field of opts with READ_ONCE() before validating or
> using it.  The netns_id snapshot keeps the namespace get/put pair
> balanced, while the other snapshots keep the remaining options from
> changing partway through an invocation.  The individual reads can still
> observe an inconsistent combination during a concurrent update, but each
> selected field value remains stable for that invocation.
>
> Fixes: aed8ee7feb44 ("net: netfilter: Deduplicate code in bpf_{xdp,skb}_ct_lookup")
> Fixes: d7e79c97c00c ("net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to allocate and insert CT")
> Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <[email protected]>

Looking a lot better, one nit: We don't really need to read reserve[]
into a separate variable. We use it only once, so reading it into the
stack isn't giving us anything, in contrast to all other fields.

The bot's ordering nit is also a nice-to-have.

pw-bot: cr

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Snapshot l4proto, ct_zone_id, ct_zone_dir, and the reserved bytes in
>   addition to netns_id, as requested in review.
> - Rebase onto current bpf/master.
>
> Please queue this fix for stable kernels.
>
>  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c
> index f98d1d4b42c3..c3395cb98c00 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c
> @@ -122,42 +122,56 @@ __bpf_nf_ct_alloc_entry(struct net *net, struct bpf_sock_tuple *bpf_tuple,
>  	struct nf_conntrack_tuple otuple, rtuple;
>  	struct nf_conntrack_zone ct_zone;
>  	struct nf_conn *ct;
> +	u16 ct_zone_id;
> +	s32 netns_id;
> +	u8 ct_zone_dir = 0;
> +	u8 reserved[3] = {};
> +	u8 l4proto;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (!(opts_len == NF_BPF_CT_OPTS_SZ || opts_len == 12))
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	netns_id = READ_ONCE(opts->netns_id);
> +	l4proto = READ_ONCE(opts->l4proto);
> +	ct_zone_id = READ_ONCE(opts->ct_zone_id);
>  	if (opts_len == NF_BPF_CT_OPTS_SZ) {
> -		if (opts->reserved[0] || opts->reserved[1] || opts->reserved[2])
> +		ct_zone_dir = READ_ONCE(opts->ct_zone_dir);
> +		reserved[0] = READ_ONCE(opts->reserved[0]);
> +		reserved[1] = READ_ONCE(opts->reserved[1]);
> +		reserved[2] = READ_ONCE(opts->reserved[2]);
> +		if (reserved[0] || reserved[1] || reserved[2])
>  			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  	} else {
> -		if (opts->ct_zone_id)
> +		if (ct_zone_id)
>  			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (unlikely(opts->netns_id < BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS))
> +	if (unlikely(netns_id < BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS))
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  
> -	err = bpf_nf_ct_tuple_parse(bpf_tuple, tuple_len, opts->l4proto,
> +	err = bpf_nf_ct_tuple_parse(bpf_tuple, tuple_len, l4proto,
>  				    IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL, &otuple);
>  	if (err < 0)
>  		return ERR_PTR(err);
>  
> -	err = bpf_nf_ct_tuple_parse(bpf_tuple, tuple_len, opts->l4proto,
> +	err = bpf_nf_ct_tuple_parse(bpf_tuple, tuple_len, l4proto,
>  				    IP_CT_DIR_REPLY, &rtuple);
>  	if (err < 0)
>  		return ERR_PTR(err);
>  
> -	if (opts->netns_id >= 0) {
> -		net = get_net_ns_by_id(net, opts->netns_id);
> +	if (netns_id >= 0) {
> +		net = get_net_ns_by_id(net, netns_id);
>  		if (unlikely(!net))
>  			return ERR_PTR(-ENONET);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (opts_len == NF_BPF_CT_OPTS_SZ) {
> -		if (opts->ct_zone_dir == 0)
> -			opts->ct_zone_dir = NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_DIR;
> -		nf_ct_zone_init(&ct_zone,
> -				opts->ct_zone_id, opts->ct_zone_dir, 0);
> +		if (ct_zone_dir == 0) {
> +			ct_zone_dir = NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_DIR;
> +			opts->ct_zone_dir = ct_zone_dir;
> +		}
> +		nf_ct_zone_init(&ct_zone, ct_zone_id, ct_zone_dir, 0);
>  	} else {
>  		ct_zone = nf_ct_zone_dflt;
>  	}
> @@ -171,7 +185,7 @@ __bpf_nf_ct_alloc_entry(struct net *net, struct bpf_sock_tuple *bpf_tuple,
>  	__nf_ct_set_timeout(ct, timeout * HZ);
>  
>  out:
> -	if (opts->netns_id >= 0)
> +	if (netns_id >= 0)
>  		put_net(net);
>  
>  	return ct;
> @@ -186,46 +200,60 @@ static struct nf_conn *__bpf_nf_ct_lookup(struct net *net,
>  	struct nf_conntrack_tuple tuple;
>  	struct nf_conntrack_zone ct_zone;
>  	struct nf_conn *ct;
> +	u16 ct_zone_id;
> +	s32 netns_id;
> +	u8 ct_zone_dir = 0;
> +	u8 reserved[3] = {};
> +	u8 l4proto;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (!opts || !bpf_tuple)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  	if (!(opts_len == NF_BPF_CT_OPTS_SZ || opts_len == 12))
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	netns_id = READ_ONCE(opts->netns_id);
> +	l4proto = READ_ONCE(opts->l4proto);
> +	ct_zone_id = READ_ONCE(opts->ct_zone_id);
>  	if (opts_len == NF_BPF_CT_OPTS_SZ) {
> -		if (opts->reserved[0] || opts->reserved[1] || opts->reserved[2])
> +		ct_zone_dir = READ_ONCE(opts->ct_zone_dir);
> +		reserved[0] = READ_ONCE(opts->reserved[0]);
> +		reserved[1] = READ_ONCE(opts->reserved[1]);
> +		reserved[2] = READ_ONCE(opts->reserved[2]);
> +		if (reserved[0] || reserved[1] || reserved[2])
>  			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  	} else {
> -		if (opts->ct_zone_id)
> +		if (ct_zone_id)
>  			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  	}
> -	if (unlikely(opts->l4proto != IPPROTO_TCP && opts->l4proto != IPPROTO_UDP))
> +	if (unlikely(l4proto != IPPROTO_TCP && l4proto != IPPROTO_UDP))
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EPROTO);
> -	if (unlikely(opts->netns_id < BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS))
> +	if (unlikely(netns_id < BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS))
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  
> -	err = bpf_nf_ct_tuple_parse(bpf_tuple, tuple_len, opts->l4proto,
> +	err = bpf_nf_ct_tuple_parse(bpf_tuple, tuple_len, l4proto,
>  				    IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL, &tuple);
>  	if (err < 0)
>  		return ERR_PTR(err);
>  
> -	if (opts->netns_id >= 0) {
> -		net = get_net_ns_by_id(net, opts->netns_id);
> +	if (netns_id >= 0) {
> +		net = get_net_ns_by_id(net, netns_id);
>  		if (unlikely(!net))
>  			return ERR_PTR(-ENONET);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (opts_len == NF_BPF_CT_OPTS_SZ) {
> -		if (opts->ct_zone_dir == 0)
> -			opts->ct_zone_dir = NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_DIR;
> -		nf_ct_zone_init(&ct_zone,
> -				opts->ct_zone_id, opts->ct_zone_dir, 0);
> +		if (ct_zone_dir == 0) {
> +			ct_zone_dir = NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_DIR;
> +			opts->ct_zone_dir = ct_zone_dir;
> +		}
> +		nf_ct_zone_init(&ct_zone, ct_zone_id, ct_zone_dir, 0);
>  	} else {
>  		ct_zone = nf_ct_zone_dflt;
>  	}
>  
>  	hash = nf_conntrack_find_get(net, &ct_zone, &tuple);
> -	if (opts->netns_id >= 0)
> +	if (netns_id >= 0)
>  		put_net(net);
>  	if (!hash)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.